* [9fans] Plan9 timers
@ 2025-01-19 9:28 tlaronde
2025-01-19 16:39 ` Ron Minnich
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: tlaronde @ 2025-01-19 9:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
In Ron Minnich's ftq README there is this:
Plan 9 support is deprecated because nobody cared, and the
default Plan 9 timers still suck.
Has work been done in this area? What is to be achieved?
--
Thierry Laronde <tlaronde +AT+ kergis +dot+ com>
http://www.kergis.com/
http://kertex.kergis.com/
Key fingerprint = 0FF7 E906 FBAF FE95 FD89 250D 52B1 AE95 6006 F40C
------------------------------------------
9fans: 9fans
Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Tf16be54ba8cc69a6-M60983caaa3a562b45d9b8815
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Plan9 timers
2025-01-19 9:28 [9fans] Plan9 timers tlaronde
@ 2025-01-19 16:39 ` Ron Minnich
2025-01-19 17:08 ` hiro
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ron Minnich @ 2025-01-19 16:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
Plan 9 timers were never very precise, although /dev/bintime might be
better now.
I'd be happy to see a forward port of ftq to Plan 9, I don't think it
would be hard.
On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 3:57 AM <tlaronde@kergis.com> wrote:
>
> In Ron Minnich's ftq README there is this:
>
> Plan 9 support is deprecated because nobody cared, and the
> default Plan 9 timers still suck.
>
> Has work been done in this area? What is to be achieved?
> --
> Thierry Laronde <tlaronde +AT+ kergis +dot+ com>
> http://www.kergis.com/
> http://kertex.kergis.com/
> Key fingerprint = 0FF7 E906 FBAF FE95 FD89 250D 52B1 AE95 6006 F40C
------------------------------------------
9fans: 9fans
Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Tf16be54ba8cc69a6-Md07ee386044fde372605045a
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Plan9 timers
2025-01-19 16:39 ` Ron Minnich
@ 2025-01-19 17:08 ` hiro
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: hiro @ 2025-01-19 17:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1295 bytes --]
since you touched this topic in the past and unlike me have some experience
with it:
given the current multicore hardware architecture, DMA, inter-core,
inter-socket latencies, how precise do you suppose should one try to make
timers in the first place? and how far from this are we?
On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 5:48 PM Ron Minnich <rminnich@p9f.org> wrote:
> Plan 9 timers were never very precise, although /dev/bintime might be
> better now.
>
> I'd be happy to see a forward port of ftq to Plan 9, I don't think it
> would be hard.
>
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 3:57 AM <tlaronde@kergis.com> wrote:
> >
> > In Ron Minnich's ftq README there is this:
> >
> > Plan 9 support is deprecated because nobody cared, and the
> > default Plan 9 timers still suck.
> >
> > Has work been done in this area? What is to be achieved?
> > --
> > Thierry Laronde <tlaronde +AT+ kergis +dot+ com>
> > http://www.kergis.com/
> > http://kertex.kergis.com/
> > Key fingerprint = 0FF7 E906 FBAF FE95 FD89 250D 52B1 AE95 6006 F40C
------------------------------------------
9fans: 9fans
Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Tf16be54ba8cc69a6-M243869c7f06d8658ac3ddcbb
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2953 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-01-19 17:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-01-19 9:28 [9fans] Plan9 timers tlaronde
2025-01-19 16:39 ` Ron Minnich
2025-01-19 17:08 ` hiro
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).