From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAJSxfmJvvsiaC=CCjPSyTeDJZuqNweuP2hBCBEAx=mmbhOXsGQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <alpine.BSO.2.10.1307151422130.30121@bath.ac.uk>
	<CAFSF3XN5LVAnNcqUBrhJwamKhRMPomqgY=01ZoUPYmJo2LEn9w@mail.gmail.com>
	<51E4719B.2010206@robinlea.com>
	<CAJSxfmLSKKnxpa7zYEU=5qQcS9unim9deg4T02KuyKAS2v=nyg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130716031229.GA65026@intma.in>
	<CAJSxfmJvvsiaC=CCjPSyTeDJZuqNweuP2hBCBEAx=mmbhOXsGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 08:29:05 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFSF3XPRzvBf0PQGiCA8iK2AT6jR4fvxaW0dsibVxH5tVH=bPg@mail.gmail.com>
From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [9fans] Moderator's Note: comp.os.plan9 Newsgroup.
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6c382622-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

You guys does not take the End-user into account at all.

On 7/16/13, Skip Tavakkolian <skip.tavakkolian@gmail.com> wrote:
> when discussing "good" and "evil", thought experiment proofs are the only
> thing anyone can offer.
>
> I should have prefaced what i said with: "if you insist on assigning
> goodness or wickedness to things, then it follows that any large, all
> encompassing ...".
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Kurt H Maier <khm-9@intma.in> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 04:07:38PM -0700, Skip Tavakkolian wrote:
>> > the nature of any large, all encompassing thing is to be good and evil
>> all
>> > at the same time. proof: imagine a company (Google, Microsoft, Oracle,
>> GE,
>> > etc.) that spans the universe. your perception of whether that thing is
>> > mostly good or mostly evil is a reflection of your belief about the
>> nature
>> > of the universe.
>> >
>>
>> this is what passes for proof these days?
>>
>>
>