From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <7aa20c07322147e6@orthanc.ca> <20181011230430.8ec148a3cb2a4d95180a4ad2@eigenstate.org> <4A1686D0-C80C-417F-A3D6-3F9EA327D35F@lsub.org> From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 19:29:33 +0200 Message-ID: To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [9fans] zero copy & 9p (was Re: PDP11 (Was: Re: what heavy negativity!) Topicbox-Message-UUID: edcd05bc-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > Also, NUMA effects are more important in practice on big multicores. Some > of the off-chip delays are brutal. yeah, we've been talking about this on #cat-v. even inside one CPU package amd puts multiple dies nowadays, and the cross-die cpu cache access delays are approaching the same dimensions as memory-access! also on each die, they have what they call ccx (cpu complex), groupings of 4 cores, which are connected much faster internally than towards the other ccx