From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190921012329.BD6B3156E80B@mail.bitblocks.com> References: <20190921012329.BD6B3156E80B@mail.bitblocks.com> From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2019 14:31:11 +0200 Message-ID: To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [9fans] go under plan9 on the radpberry pi? Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0a4013d8-eada-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 yeah, but check small blocksize random read/write vs. AoE or 9p over ethernet. I'm not sure how efficient usb3 in terms of latency :) On 9/21/19, Bakul Shah wrote: > On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 09:53:07 +0100 Richard Miller <9fans@hamnavoe.com> > wrote: >> >> > Another option worth exploring may >> > be AOE as pi4 has a GbE (I haven't tried this yet). >> >> My go test builders are running with "local" fossil on a slice >> of disk provided over AoE from an atom server. I tried various >> configurations and this gave me the best performance. This is >> with 3B+ machines on "gigabit" ethernet throttled by rubbish usb. >> >> Pi4 has proper GbE, but also has usb3 so a local ssd drive might >> be a practical alternative. More experiments to do. > > On linux/pi4 I get about 230MB/s for seq. read on a $10 USB3.1 > Samsung flash drive. Time to get a new SSD! > >