Re: [9fans] Dual dialing/forking sessions to increase 9P throughput

[hiro <23hiro@gmail.com>]

yes but there is no benefit to do that

On 1/5/21, Joe S <joe@lifesoftserv.com> wrote:
> hiro:
>     The purpose of doing this was not to just access multiple parts of the
> file. I was working off the quote below.  Maybe a file server thats purpose
> is to mux parts of another file sounded like fun. My thoughts are that you
> could then transer thoes chunks on a single destination on seperate
> connections.
>
> eg.
>     % mux -C 3 -F large.file
>     % tree.
>           ├── large.file
>           └── large.file.mux
>               ├── 1
>               ├── 2
>               └── 3
>
> 1 directory, 4 files
>
> Like I said though still learning though.
>
> On Wednesday, 30 December 2020, at 12:20 AM, cigar562hfsp952fans wrote:
>> There is, however, a very simple reason why this approach won't really
> work: the fids for a file opened on one connection won't be recognized
> by the server on the other connection.

------------------------------------------
9fans: 9fans
Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Te69bb0fce0f0ffaf-M4e51600cccb05b53aabb5783
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription