If it wasn't for this cancerous web applications ordeal, I would be happy
with OpenBSD & rio,
and maybe with pure Plan 9 in the future ..

Simon

On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Ethan Grammatikidis <eekee57@fastmail.fm>wrote:

> On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 21:17:14 +0200
> simon softnet <ph.softnet@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Because it's more likely that users will settle with linux+some plan 9
> > features
> > instead of with pure plan 9
>
> Most of us have to anyway.
>
> For now...
>
> >
> > Simon
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 9:12 PM, David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > I don't see why anyone combining ideas from Plan 9 into Linux hurts
> > > Plan 9 as long as Plan 9 continues to exist.
> > >
> > > On Saturday, July 16, 2011, simon softnet <ph.softnet@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > Please, don't let plan 9 and linux be interrelated in the future in
> any
> > > way ...Future plan 9 users have the opportunity to experience novel
> > > user-space paradigms.Why do they have to be sucked into the linux
> world?
> > > >
> > > > Simon
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Robert Seaton <seatonr@dupage.edu>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> one might find http://www.glendix.org/ project interesting
> > > >
> > > > The project actually already uses a glendix patched kernel and much
> of
> > > > my upcoming work will be focused on porting more of Plan 9's syscalls
> > > > to the Linux kernel so that more native Plan 9 apps can be run on
> > > > Linux. :)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
>
>