From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20110716203208.5a768dfe@lahti.ethans.dre.am> References: <20110716203208.5a768dfe@lahti.ethans.dre.am> Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 23:10:24 +0200 Message-ID: From: simon softnet To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd35176cf234404a8363197 Subject: Re: [9fans] novel userspace paradigms introduced by plan 9 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 02d43848-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --000e0cd35176cf234404a8363197 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 If it wasn't for this cancerous web applications ordeal, I would be happy with OpenBSD & rio, and maybe with pure Plan 9 in the future .. Simon On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote: > On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 21:17:14 +0200 > simon softnet wrote: > > > Because it's more likely that users will settle with linux+some plan 9 > > features > > instead of with pure plan 9 > > Most of us have to anyway. > > For now... > > > > > Simon > > > > On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 9:12 PM, David Leimbach > wrote: > > > > > I don't see why anyone combining ideas from Plan 9 into Linux hurts > > > Plan 9 as long as Plan 9 continues to exist. > > > > > > On Saturday, July 16, 2011, simon softnet > wrote: > > > > Please, don't let plan 9 and linux be interrelated in the future in > any > > > way ...Future plan 9 users have the opportunity to experience novel > > > user-space paradigms.Why do they have to be sucked into the linux > world? > > > > > > > > Simon > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Robert Seaton > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> one might find http://www.glendix.org/ project interesting > > > > > > > > The project actually already uses a glendix patched kernel and much > of > > > > my upcoming work will be focused on porting more of Plan 9's syscalls > > > > to the Linux kernel so that more native Plan 9 apps can be run on > > > > Linux. :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --000e0cd35176cf234404a8363197 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If it wasn't for this cancerous web applications ordeal, I would be hap= py with OpenBSD & rio,
and maybe with pure Plan 9 in the future ..<= /div>

Simon

On Sa= t, Jul 16, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Ethan Grammatikidis <eekee57@fastmail.fm> wrote:=
On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 21:17:14 +0200
simon softnet <ph.softnet@gmail.com> wrote:

> Because it's more likely that users will s= ettle with linux+some plan 9
> features
> instead of with pure plan 9

Most of us have to anyway.

For now...

>
> Simon
>
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 9:12 PM, David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I don't see why anyone combining ideas from Plan 9 into Linux= hurts
> > Plan 9 as long as Plan 9 continues to exist.
> >
> > On Saturday, July 16, 2011, simon softnet <ph.softnet@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Please, don't let plan 9 and linux be interrelated in th= e future in any
> > way ...Future plan 9 users have the opportunity to experience nov= el
> > user-space paradigms.Why do they have to be sucked into the linux= world?
> > >
> > > Simon
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Robert Seaton <seatonr@dupage.edu>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> one might find http://www.glendix.org/ project interesting
> > >
> > > The project actually already uses a glendix patched kernel a= nd much of
> > > my upcoming work will be focused on porting more of Plan 9&#= 39;s syscalls
> > > to the Linux kernel so that more native Plan 9 apps can be r= un on
> > > Linux. :)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >


--000e0cd35176cf234404a8363197--