From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <697329325.114468.1491922581749.JavaMail.zimbra@well.com> From: Winston Kodogo Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 15:31:58 +1200 Message-ID: To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113d1a74d096eb054cefd9e4 Subject: Re: [9fans] ps bug Topicbox-Message-UUID: b9c9e424-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --001a113d1a74d096eb054cefd9e4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 There is something deeply wrong with many things. Just ask jwz: https://www.jwz.org/blog/2017/04/would-you-like-to-supersize-that-for-a-dollar-extra/ But at least ed is still the standard editor. Such is progress. On 12 April 2017 at 15:16, Prof Brucee wrote: > Ubuntu doesn't return all processes for "ps -e" so I guess there's > something deeply wrong with /proc. > > brucee > > On 12/04/2017 12:56 AM, "Mat Kovach" wrote: > > From the man page: > > =$ man ps > > PS(1) PS(1) > > NAME > ps, psu - process status > > SYNOPSIS > ps [ -pa ] > > psu [ -pa ] [ user ] > > [snip] > With the -p flag, ps also prints, after the system time, the > baseline and current priorities of each process. > > The -a flag causes ps to print the arguments for the pro- > cess. Newlines in arguments will be translated to spaces > for display. > > plan9port's ps does not have a '-e' option, if given it is ignore. > > Checking the script, ps uses the os version of ps and the arguments -axww > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Bruce Ellis" > *To: *"Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net> > *Sent: *Tuesday, April 11, 2017 2:54:07 AM > *Subject: *[9fans] ps bug > > using plan9ports' "ps -e" does not print all processes. dirread /proc fun > I guess. > brucee > > > --001a113d1a74d096eb054cefd9e4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
There is something deeply wrong with many things. Just ask= jwz:=C2=A0

https://www.jwz.org/b= log/2017/04/would-you-like-to-supersize-that-for-a-dollar-extra/
But at least ed is still the standard editor. Such is progress= .

On 12 April 2017 at 15:16, Prof Brucee <prof.brucee@gmail.com>= ; wrote:
Ubuntu = doesn't return all processes for "ps -e" so I guess there'= ;s something deeply wrong with /proc.

brucee
<= /span>

On 12/04/2017 12:56 AM, "Mat Kovach= " <mek@well.com> wrote:
From the man page:

=3D$ man ps

=C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 PS(1) =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 PS(1)

= =C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0 NAME
=C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0ps, psu= - process status

=C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0 SYNOPSIS
=C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0ps [ -pa ]

=C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0psu [ -pa ] [ user ]

=C2=A0[snip]
=C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0With the -p flag, ps also prints, after the system time, t= he
=C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0baseline and current prioriti= es of each process.

=C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0The -a f= lag causes ps to print the arguments for the pro-
=C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0cess.=C2=A0 Newlines in arguments will be translated to= spaces
=C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0for display.

plan= 9port's ps does not have a '-e' option, if given it is ignore.<= br>
Checking the script, ps uses the os version of ps =C2=A0and the argu= ments -axww

From: "Bruce Ellis" <bruce.ellis@gmail.com>
To: <= /b>"Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>
Sent: T= uesday, April 11, 2017 2:54:07 AM
Subject: [9fans] ps bug

using plan9ports' "ps -e" does not print all processes. dir= read /proc fun I guess.
brucee



--001a113d1a74d096eb054cefd9e4--