From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 12:16:52 +1300 Message-ID: From: Winston Kodogo To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2959a54e22404ef6992f7 Subject: Re: [9fans] Alternative Plan 9 Logo Topicbox-Message-UUID: b07762da-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --001a11c2959a54e22404ef6992f7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > I wonder who could decide to adopt it on behalf of the community? > > As I understand it, this list is not a community, but an anarcho-syndicalist commune. In which case the executive officer for the week can decide to adopt the new logo, but all decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting, by a simple majority in the case of purely internal affairs, but by a two-thirds majority in the case of more major (I ORDER YOU TO BE QUIET - SIGNED BOYD (RIP)). So my question is, do we need a simple majority to adopt the new logo, or will a two-thirds majority be called for? --001a11c2959a54e22404ef6992f7 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

=
> I wonder who could d= ecide to adopt it on behalf of the community?

As I understand it, this list is not a community, but= an anarcho-syndicalist commune.

In which case the executive office= r for the week can decide to adopt the new logo, but all decisions of that = officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting, by a simple maj= ority in the case of purely internal affairs, but by a two-thirds majority = in the case of more major (I ORDER YOU TO BE QUIET - SIGNED BOYD (RIP)).

So my question is, do we n= eed a simple majority to adopt the new logo, or will a two-thirds majority = be called for?
--001a11c2959a54e22404ef6992f7--