From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <d76c4d501abff0ca6da3e12240c997cc@brasstown.quanstro.net>
References: <CAOw7k5j5ePe1QYw7nmkXQA8pRhsgEDLUuFus48rUUX6uS9HOVw@mail.gmail.com>
	<826abb8cf0c1ea41e3ebc081df3169c7@proxima.alt.za>
	<CAOw7k5ggBBkJYOX_Qa-9Jh+h3D7wcYsmpjWyexFMba46LPvRrQ@mail.gmail.c>
	<d76c4d501abff0ca6da3e12240c997cc@brasstown.quanstro.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 16:25:51 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFo14L0ByQi6tdWssiwW6DCJYyD6cp2+V1KOkRsi525rpr8QfQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Hugo Rivera <uair00@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [9fans] Acme: the way the future actually was
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b9366f8e-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

I knew it because I read the paper :-)

2012/9/14 erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>:
> On Fri Sep 14 10:12:24 EDT 2012, charles.forsyth@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Probably never heard of Oberon either.
>
> neither is knowledge of oberon ubiquitous among 9fans, who may
> not realize that acme itself is a copy.
>
> - erik
>



--
Hugo