From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0f0fc69bdeaa05f0bdac2954d8d3a1db@coraid.com>
References: <CAG3N4d81u5p-WVz5aXnjGE8ON5BMd-AEr0xRMjP+Ug4G9Db=UA@mail.gmail.c>
	<f78242cdae3fa424364038ed0d7c7dd0@coraid.com>
	<CAG3N4d_5f97O85mwGnrawwiGQAPN+K6CTQ0vbpk2EexkpbH0qg@mail.gmail.c>
	<0f0fc69bdeaa05f0bdac2954d8d3a1db@coraid.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 19:19:20 +0300
Message-ID: <CAG3N4d-pChG=FhQ4zPOGxqdmiqEm2omg+5YuvG3MjPE2OKEUeA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Yaroslav <yarikos@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [9fans] rc: fn name @{block}
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 72ce38d8-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

>> term% fn x @{x=y}
>> term% whatis x
>> fn x {x=y}
>
> creates to functions x and '@' definition {x=y}.

The question is why it discards @ here?