From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <01b90367d1b21dd4d899771ed5189c3a@kw.quanstro.net> References: <09803b4d93511fdb3e2232a9759e5aa8@isd.dp.ua> <01b90367d1b21dd4d899771ed5189c3a@kw.quanstro.net> Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 17:35:39 +0200 Message-ID: From: Yaroslav To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9ccd516c4953104d5384f37 Subject: Re: [9fans] APE libsec Topicbox-Message-UUID: 161fe18a-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --14dae9ccd516c4953104d5384f37 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 2013/2/5 erik quanstrom > looks good, but i'd do libsec at the same time. > unless you know of a compelling reason for these > to support a different set of algorithms? > Agree. /n/sources/patch/x509-oids --14dae9ccd516c4953104d5384f37 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= 2013/2/5 erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
looks good, but i'd do libsec at the same time.
unless you know of a compelling reason for these
to support a different set of algorithms?

Agree= .

/n/s= ources/patch/x509-oids


--14dae9ccd516c4953104d5384f37--