Re: [9fans] rc: fn name @{block}

[Yaroslav <yarikos@gmail.com>]

> you've misunderstood the current grammar.  you have defined 2 functions
> name and '@' as {block}.  the binding, illustrated with parens is
>        fn (name @) {block}
> the production in the grammer is
>        FN words brace
> but since once production for words is words -> keyword, a keyword
> is a valid function name.

Then, how would you explain this:

term% fn x @{x=y}
term% whatis x
fn x {x=y}
term% fn 'x @'{x=y}
term% whatis 'x @'
fn 'x @' {x=y}