From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAGNd-2NQ-MsSqcuFJTpOHHctcLt_EbN1jb_GwyHwz-cTr+abHg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGNd-2NQ-MsSqcuFJTpOHHctcLt_EbN1jb_GwyHwz-cTr+abHg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 07:52:11 -0500
Message-ID: <CAGGHmKG_YqF=RL+ZbdrUcu4JHhmcLJM0zc8Xtn6iP8+9cNvd4Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Steven Stallion <sstallion@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [9fans] Mistake in Plan9 Mercual port?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: f349ed76-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Pavel Klinkovsk=C3=BD
<pavel.klinkovsky@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am using native Plan9.

Hi Pavel,

Internally, Mercurial makes calls to OpenSSH, which doesn't quite work
as advertised on Plan 9. For the most part, using HTTP/S repositories
will give you the best bang for the proverbial buck. When I worked on
the original port, SSHv2 had not been released yet - now that it's out
there and is working it may be time to fix this hole in the port.

Cheers,

Steve