From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAGNd-2NwZTh5BPJo+EX0=8kmwK8_r3YivftMbhpybfYGS9DYVw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGNd-2NwZTh5BPJo+EX0=8kmwK8_r3YivftMbhpybfYGS9DYVw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed,  8 Jan 2014 09:23:51 -0600
Message-ID: <CAGGHmKHP17NsSApo=d8TZRC1b8iLRo7LsJ3_efHFzaDu-4Wk2w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Steven Stallion <sstallion@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [9fans] Maximal number of processes
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b0a3b042-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 2:28 AM, Pavel Klinkovsk=FD
<pavel.klinkovsky@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to know whether there is any hard (based on CPU architecture=
)
> limit of maximal number of processes in Plan9 on Intel or ARM.
>
> I do not think the soft limit like the lack of memory... ;)
>
> Thanks in advance for any hint.

Hi Pavel,

It absolutely does. Depending on the kernel you are booting,
conf.nproc will be set in a variety of different ways. This is
generally set in confinit, called from main. The obvious example is
the pc kernel:

    conf.nproc =3D 100 + ((conf.npage*BY2PG)/MB)*5;
    if(cpuserver)
            conf.nproc *=3D 3;
    if(conf.nproc > 2000)
            conf.nproc =3D 2000;

In general, you will find that 2000 is the highest allowable due to
limits imposed by proc.c. Other architectures can (and will) place
additional restrictions. A non-FCSE ARM implementation could elect to
only support 256 processes to avoid additional switching overhead for
example.

At the end of the day, the only way to be sure is to read the source.
It will give you a better familiarity with the system and probably
avoid some unnecessary perturbation.

Cheers,

Steve