From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5547d58ef803a24a0216c22aed0e2e8b@brasstown.quanstro.net> References: <20130601071926.GA2936@polynum.com> <5547d58ef803a24a0216c22aed0e2e8b@brasstown.quanstro.net> Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2013 22:40:58 -0700 Message-ID: From: Steven Stallion To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec52156d1b79b3304de396862 Subject: Re: [9fans] ARM and u-boot Topicbox-Message-UUID: 60c37878-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --bcaec52156d1b79b3304de396862 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 6:09 AM, erik quanstrom wrote: > also note, that the kw kernel is bootable without uimage > support. > Sure, though supporting uImage means you get a few things for free, not to mention it isn't ELF. This deserves a proper write up - I'll probably do something for IWP9 if I can manage to complete the port in time. At the very least, it will be WIP. There are a few subtle bits as to why I ended up going with uImages. --bcaec52156d1b79b3304de396862 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 6:09 AM, erik quanstrom <qua= nstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
also note, that the kw kernel is bootable wi= thout uimage
support.

Sure, though supporting = uImage means you get a few things for free, not to mention it isn't ELF= . This deserves a proper write up - I'll probably do something for IWP9= if I can manage to complete the port in time. At the very least, it will b= e WIP. There are a few subtle bits as to why I ended up going with uImages.=
--bcaec52156d1b79b3304de396862--