From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <621fee0ec5c5de3d0ea868f7626f3e8a@proxima.alt.za>
References: <20140507073809.62e1138e@zinc.9fans.fr>
	<621fee0ec5c5de3d0ea868f7626f3e8a@proxima.alt.za>
Date: Wed,  7 May 2014 09:38:33 +0100
Message-ID: <CAGMcHPpVofXzSfY1LffHJz6b6t6MUFPYzohCJM1bD=jvW-v3Wg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Riddler <riddler876@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113468f032147004f8cb4aae
Subject: [9fans]  [GSOC] plan9 which arch code to use?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e031d276-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

--001a113468f032147004f8cb4aae
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Out of curiosity is there a reason that the patches for a 64bit install
never ended up in the main plan9 codebase?

--001a113468f032147004f8cb4aae
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

<p dir="ltr">Out of curiosity is there a reason that the patches for a 64bit install never ended up in the main plan9 codebase?</p>

--001a113468f032147004f8cb4aae--