From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20150119085225.59e49568@zinc.9fans.fr>
References: <CAL_X0tD7rWR0cqS8QuTe-vjdX5t_UXFXWoQxj7p4XpHp+V=hSA@mail.gmail.com>
	<38792ced13d4ed51db1573cf42bb7249@brasstown.quanstro.net>
	<A322A247-B6C1-45A4-A837-3187DF43F663@gmail.com>
	<91e3601b39c9e4cb04e86c26f171e94d@brasstown.quanstro.net>
	<B0016A05-E6CF-423A-8BFD-97762CC3FB2B@gmail.com>
	<c0aa72baaa6456a5b5585ef7a5545141@brasstown.quanstro.net>
	<CAL_X0tBnTmXJ-c0pYN2GjU92snANBLho2OS301oVd8JC9JmVLg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150119085225.59e49568@zinc.9fans.fr>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 10:35:20 +0100
Message-ID: <CAGP-aFxw6Z_JwD9m7hnZHGQMRukdZKO0cnvjZSExPUSYJ=DLnA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Zbigniew Radosz <zbigniew.radosz@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0122e8e05877d2050d1228d3
Subject: Re: [9fans] runebase breaking libs build
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 3a41df4a-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

--089e0122e8e05877d2050d1228d3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi 9fans,

I also attempted to build amd64 version some time ago, and it failed in
libc. I gave up then, but since someone brought this up, let me ask my
question here.

Bell Labs doesn't distribute amd64 binaries. It seems
> you are running a compiler built before the long rune
> change (before May 2013), but the sources are more recent.
>
> In this case, you need to re-bootstrap the compiler,
> as described here:
>
> http://9fans.net/archive/2013/05/81
>

I followed this one and it solves the runebase problem, but libc build
still fails as there is no amd64 subdir in libc. Looks like the labs
version does not have amd64 code for libc. Is that correct? And is libc the
only missing part?

--
Zbigniew Radosz

--089e0122e8e05877d2050d1228d3
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Hi 9fans,<div><br></div><div>I also attempted to build amd=
64 version some time ago, and it failed in libc. I gave up then, but since =
someone brought this up, let me ask my question here.<br><div class=3D"gmai=
l_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" s=
tyle=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Bell=
 Labs doesn&#39;t distribute amd64 binaries. It seems<br>
you are running a compiler built before the long rune<br>
change (before May 2013), but the sources are more recent.<br>
<br>
In this case, you need to re-bootstrap the compiler,<br>
as described here:<br>
<br>
<a href=3D"http://9fans.net/archive/2013/05/81" target=3D"_blank">http://9f=
ans.net/archive/2013/05/81</a><br></blockquote></div><div class=3D"gmail_ex=
tra"><br></div>I followed this one and it solves the runebase problem, but =
libc build still fails as there is no amd64 subdir in libc. Looks like the =
labs version does not have amd64 code for libc. Is that correct? And is lib=
c the only missing part?<br clear=3D"all"><div><br></div>--=C2=A0<div class=
=3D"gmail_signature">Zbigniew Radosz</div>
</div></div></div>

--089e0122e8e05877d2050d1228d3--