From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2ef702cbb7ff904c32b9ce41cde87487@proxima.alt.za> References: <2ef702cbb7ff904c32b9ce41cde87487@proxima.alt.za> Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 13:48:13 -0700 Message-ID: From: Christopher Nielsen To: lucio@proxima.alt.za, Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [9fans] nanosleep()? Topicbox-Message-UUID: 3c9f5940-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 Based on golang mailing list discussions, I do believe that the intent is to have something like goinstall be the build tool for go, but I could have misinterpreted what I read. On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 07:32, Lucio De Re wrote: >> just take unsuitable things out of the mkfiles, since no other system >> is using those. > > I was discussing with Ron the fact that in the longer term goinstall > ought to supersede both gmake (at last!) and mk, in building Go. I > guess it needs to deal with situations like the present one kind of a > priori. > > ++L > > > -- Christopher Nielsen "They who can give up essential liberty for temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." --Benjamin Franklin "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants." --Thomas Jefferson