From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAB8pEY7oB3qoZEdX_gKpwxUF+yBdEh0z1yRVr26JFpr0O_4dJQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAH7AAvoHfq9iDApYKb63odzsG9mKtQu93jqANne8VvvNGPDxEQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<5251BEC0.1090807@gmail.com>
	<f6a939bc21e290163987c994eb70d202@brasstown.quanstro.net>
	<CAH7AAvpqFUcU=MfvgBv=Ssd4Z-Z-B6dT_X7=2Kf3dkFP+6TA6w@mail.gmail.com>
	<c5e78ac10e48499e916705767a59c573@ladd.quanstro.net>
	<CAH7AAvr0KHUfN2mQWrK2NuWqQyZ_hhW9JwTRyG_L6xWD+NOa0A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAB8pEY7oB3qoZEdX_gKpwxUF+yBdEh0z1yRVr26JFpr0O_4dJQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun,  6 Oct 2013 14:15:39 -0700
Message-ID: <CAH7AAvr12POh_UvYrVFhEzpFGzL2MW215zdrH7ArWnacF=Cw2g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Christopher Nielsen <cnielsen@pobox.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [9fans] VMware and 9atom
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 840148c4-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Jacob Todd <jaketodd422@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Christopher Nielsen <cnielsen@pobox.com> wrote:
>> Sadly, no. That would have been my first choice, if it were an option.
>> I know ahci works great in 9atom. I'll give virtualbox a whirl.
>
> You would probably be better off using qemu than virtualbox.

I've had bad luck with qemu on windows, which is sadly what I am
currently stuck with as a platform. It has caused me great pain, and
will hopefully change soon.

--
Christopher Nielsen
"They who can give up essential liberty for temporary safety, deserve
neither liberty nor safety." --Benjamin Franklin
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the
blood of patriots & tyrants." --Thomas Jefferson