Re: [9fans] equality sign in Rc

[Giacomo Tesio <giacomo@tesio.it>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 966 bytes --]

Actually a --fu variable is not that useful in Plan 9:

% --fu=bar
% echo $--fu
rc: null list in concatenation
% echo "$--fu"
rc: null list in concatenation
% ls /env
'/env/*'
/env/--fu
...

So rc can create a variable starting with more than one '-', but can't use
it.

So I wonder if there is a definition of "the right thing" that can fix this
incongruence and also allow the UNIX usage.


Giacomoec


2017-05-15 17:59 GMT+02:00 Charles Forsyth <charles.forsyth@gmail.com>:

>
> On 15 May 2017 at 16:54, Erik Quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
>
>> if we implement the right thing, then arguments like --fu=bar will be
>> 'eaten silently' from the perspective of the (human) operator.  sure gigo,
>> but this seems extra hard o get right in a Unix environment.
>
>
> It would be better then to leave things as they are.
> = is part of rc syntax, like {} and (), and it interprets it, not the
> commands, unless quoted.
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1750 bytes --]