From: Giacomo Tesio <giacomo@tesio.it>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Returning to Plan 9: Virtualization, Distributions
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 00:00:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHL7psGzgykJtaOxiqzPHo_v4FvQKanE6KNa77JnSd7nJ4nS9A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ECC274A.8090808@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1243 bytes --]
Please, (b)log the path: I'd like to play again with plan9... but I
completely forgot how I had configured qemu-kvm (and I remember that I had
had some trouble with the network on my debian)... :-(
Giacomo
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Joel C. Salomon <joelcsalomon@gmail.com>wrote:
> > On 11/22/2011 9:39 AM, Joel C. Salomon wrote:
> >> After a long hiatus, I'd like to get back to experimenting with Plan
> >> 9. I have an Ubuntu Linux laptop with AMD's virtualization extensions
> >> supported by the CPU, so I figure my best bet is one of the umpteen
> >> virtualization tools. Which is best supported by Plan 9 — virtualbox,
> >> qemu, or something else?
>
> On 11/22/2011 02:41 PM, Jack Norton wrote:
> > I have had good luck with qemu-kvm. I've even got a VPS running with
> > all the management bells and wistles like libvirt and such. It has been
> > running solid since march (lab's plan9 with fossil only).
>
> On 11/22/2011 05:14 PM, John Floren wrote:
> > I found that Virtualbox worked very well when I was fiddling with my
> > Macbook on the way back from IWP9. I haven't tried it on the thinkpad
> > yet.
>
> Thanks; I'll try them in turn, see if I get one to work.
>
> —Joel
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1761 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-22 23:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-22 15:39 Joel C. Salomon
2011-11-22 15:46 ` ron minnich
2011-11-22 15:56 ` Gabriel Díaz López de la llave
[not found] ` <CAL_gH73FUfzOdFg1HHMomr8_kubMwYvraXnkYUqQQ4hbzD33iw@mail.gmail.c>
2011-11-22 16:00 ` erik quanstrom
2011-11-22 22:57 ` Joel C. Salomon
2011-11-22 23:04 ` erik quanstrom
2011-11-22 23:21 ` ron minnich
2011-11-23 7:49 ` Francisco J Ballesteros
2011-11-22 23:06 ` John Floren
2011-11-22 19:41 ` Jack Norton
2011-11-22 22:50 ` Joel C. Salomon
2011-11-22 23:00 ` Giacomo Tesio [this message]
2011-11-22 22:14 ` John Floren
2011-11-22 22:53 ` [9fans] Let's get VM configs onto the Wiki Lyndon Nerenberg
2011-11-22 22:58 ` erik quanstrom
2011-11-22 23:12 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2011-11-22 23:22 ` andrey mirtchovski
2011-11-22 23:22 ` andrey mirtchovski
2011-11-22 23:37 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2011-11-22 23:33 ` andrew zerger
2011-11-24 21:16 ` Bakul Shah
2011-11-24 21:25 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2011-11-24 22:05 ` ron minnich
2011-11-24 22:28 ` Bakul Shah
2011-11-27 0:14 ` [9fans] Returning to Plan 9: Virtualization, Distributions Ruben Schuller
2011-11-27 6:29 ` Jens Staal
2011-11-27 7:08 ` John Floren
2011-11-27 9:18 ` Lucio De Re
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAHL7psGzgykJtaOxiqzPHo_v4FvQKanE6KNa77JnSd7nJ4nS9A@mail.gmail.com \
--to=giacomo@tesio.it \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).