From: Mart Zirnask <martzirnask@gmail.com>
To: 9fans <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] New to plan9
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2021 15:35:21 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHUAchw3vphf1--KTOerLhsGN-xJhZvsgosEB3ka4VJbxm43Bg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <141E9336AE67480E134FDE7154F09B80@pixelheresy.com>
Also, if you want an overview of the system, Nemo's book "Introduction
to Operating Systems Abstractions Using Plan 9 from Bell Labs" is an
awesome resource.
http://doc.cat-v.org/plan_9/9.intro.pdf
Best,
Mart
On Sat, 16 Oct 2021 at 13:14, Keith Gibbs <k@pixelheresy.com> wrote:
>
> Yeah, don't switch for simple tools like mothra, but as you learn
> more, there are strengths to both.
>
> I ran the "9miller" Pi version for a bit and as a retro computer
> collector and old software junkie, I enjoyed myself, but I played with
> VMs and then got some baremetal installs of 9front going.
>
> 9legacy is fantastic for the "historical preservation" end of things
> and it totally usable. I found myself more and more drawn to 9front
> because it is more about *using* Plan 9 for either specialized purpose
> or daily driver usage. I personally run a 9front cpu+auth server on
> my network with 9p/drawterm ports forwarded from my fiber hookup. In
> that way, I always have access to my 9 box from the office, from home,
> from anywhere. I use it for writing, C, Go, IRC, as well as a
> webserver. Also, since it is on my network, I can basically access
> any machine of mine via sshfs or 9p at any time, making it a Rosetta
> Stone of sorts. Most new software made by the community tends to be
> developed with 9front in mind/on 9front, so if you are looking for
> things like YouTube playback, security, a more modern browser (netsurf
> port), esoteric programming languages, etc. you will have an easier
> time on 9front.
>
> That being said, some really old stuff doesn't quite work the same as
> old old 9, which can get annoying if you find docs or software from
> decades ago, but that's less important for me personally.
>
> So get your feet wet! If you find you like the retro computing aspect
> most, 9legacy is a great distro. If you are most interested in
> modern/more experimental stuff, 9front is awesome. That being said,
> 9front is *not that far* from Plan 9 from Bell Labs 4th edition,
> especially compared to Harvey, Jehanne, or even Inferno in a lot of
> ways. Folks from both (actually *all*) communities are frequent
> readers/users of this mailing list.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> -pixelheresy
>
> Quoth joseph turco <italian.pepe.32@gmail.com>:
> > Your quite right, I wouldn't switch to 9front for that reason, but is nice
> > that 9front does have more secure protocols in place. I stuck with bell
> > labs because the RPI iso was right there I wanted to see the OS from the
> > beginning. Its also why I have the bootable 9legacy USB for my old desktop,
> > but that's sitting around until I can figure out the OS, so then I can get
> > it running how I want on there, and link up the systems so that the desktop
> > acts as a shared fs.
------------------------------------------
9fans: 9fans
Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T4e8989ee42951fa0-M4766c37c731ef608e2e21fc3
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-16 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-15 12:53 joseph turco
2021-10-15 13:05 ` Sigrid Solveig Haflínudóttir
2021-10-15 14:07 ` sirjofri
2021-10-15 17:29 ` joseph turco
2021-10-15 17:45 ` Michael Misch
2021-10-15 18:36 ` joseph turco
2021-10-15 18:56 ` hiro
2021-10-15 21:00 ` joseph turco
2021-10-16 10:13 ` Keith Gibbs
2021-10-16 12:35 ` Mart Zirnask [this message]
2021-10-16 14:08 ` Conor Williams
2021-10-16 19:07 ` joseph turco
2021-10-16 19:11 ` hiro
2021-10-17 18:54 ` antonio.fin
2021-10-18 16:26 ` joseph turco
2021-10-19 17:46 ` antonio.fin
2021-10-19 21:27 ` Michael Misch
2021-10-20 15:50 ` joseph turco
2021-10-20 16:03 ` Sigrid Solveig Haflínudóttir
2021-10-20 16:46 ` joseph turco
2021-10-20 16:56 ` Sigrid Solveig Haflínudóttir
2021-10-20 17:06 ` joseph turco
2021-10-20 17:14 ` Sigrid Solveig Haflínudóttir
2021-10-20 18:44 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2021-10-20 21:55 ` joseph turco
2021-10-16 2:45 ` vic.thacker
2021-10-15 15:54 ` smj
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-08-23 14:29 [9fans] New to Plan9 Russ Cox
2000-08-26 20:23 ` Alexander Viro
[not found] <e_n_d_e_r@hotmail.com>
2000-08-23 9:10 ` Roy Miller
2000-08-23 15:29 ` James A. Robinson
2000-08-24 8:35 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAHUAchw3vphf1--KTOerLhsGN-xJhZvsgosEB3ka4VJbxm43Bg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=martzirnask@gmail.com \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).