9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Lonjaret <mathieu.lonjaret@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] acme tag bars stacking
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 16:16:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHcDtn=LfLezSEyORhSraL-YJJOcrWCU+haBggshCWe_cm3Utw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADErNDsmDbsReRL4Kby2E+uCpE+h7JuwkjNip0h5Rg6gHiXrpQ@mail.gmail.com>

yeah, good points.

On 29 October 2016 at 00:47, yy <yiyu.jgl@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 28 October 2016 at 16:23, Mathieu Lonjaret
> <mathieu.lonjaret@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Anyway, does anyone know what the rationale was for choosing to stack
>> them at the bottom? Or why it would be a a bad idea to make them stack
>> at the top instead?
>
> Let's suppose you have many windows in a column. When you work in one
> of them, you B2 it and put it on the top of the stack. Then you work
> on another one and it goes to the top, moving the previous one to the
> second position, and so on. This way, your most recently used windows
> are always on top, the least used ones go to the bottom of the stack.
> I would find counterintuitive that the windows you used a longer time
> ago stayed at the top, between your "working windows" and the column
> and main tag lines.
>
> But I would guess the main reason it works this way is that it seemed
> more natural to move a window to the head than to the tail of a linked
> list, and it just worked well enough.
>
> I see how it may be more practical to stack them at the top when
> working only with two or three windows, but it would be kind of weird
> if you have ten. If you feel it will fit your workflow better, it is
> probably not too difficult to get it done.
>
>
> --
> - yiyus || JGL .
>



  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-30 15:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-28 14:23 Mathieu Lonjaret
2016-10-28 14:37 ` Mark van Atten
2016-10-28 14:48   ` James A. Robinson
2016-10-28 15:02   ` Mathieu Lonjaret
2016-10-28 22:47 ` yy
2016-10-30 15:16   ` Mathieu Lonjaret [this message]
2016-11-01  1:23     ` Anthony Sorace
2016-11-05 18:10       ` Mathieu Lonjaret

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAHcDtn=LfLezSEyORhSraL-YJJOcrWCU+haBggshCWe_cm3Utw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=mathieu.lonjaret@gmail.com \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).