From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20120420213934.1v2ed14r3r0kc80c@courrier.univ-paris1.fr> From: Mathieu Lonjaret Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 23:35:59 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: git and (p9p) acme To: Russ Cox Cc: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>, plan9port-dev@googlegroups.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7f9e280c-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 So, are you saying E just works out of the box for you as the $EDITOR for git/hg? Or did you have to tweak a few things like what Aram and Dexen describe? I wouldn't mind using E as it is, with Put being the trigger to the tool (git in that case), but it does not seem to be working here. On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Russ Cox wrote: > I guess it depends on what you expect to break. > I like using the E script because (once you learn not > to click Put, which doesn't take too long) after I click > Put the window is still there with my work in it in case > the tool I just sent it to chooses to blow up and > discard my efforts. > > Russ