From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7280ffd98eb1bf4ae95247cd401a221a@proxima.alt.za> References: <7280ffd98eb1bf4ae95247cd401a221a@proxima.alt.za> From: Stanley Lieber Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 22:12:28 -0600 Message-ID: To: lucio@proxima.alt.za, Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [9fans] 9vx instability Topicbox-Message-UUID: 45dfc4ea-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Lucio De Re wrote: >> I have great respect for Geoff and what he has been and continues to >> do for Plan 9. > > I'd like to add my voice to this. =C2=A0And I take exception to Schmidt > taking the glory for cwfs, which is Geoff Collyer's work and is not in > any way to be treated as a sequel to Fossil. Schmidt didn't take credit for anything. The reporter asked about the changes in 9front and we tried to explain; starting with an overview of what Plan 9 is, and proceeding on to a description of the hows and whys of the changes. The reporter drew his own conclusions and presented them as facts (and sometimes, as quotes). The article is filled with these sorts of inaccuracies. No one involved with 9front saw the text of the article before it was poste= d. -sl