From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <01b425e735562b17674ddacbdca8aeaf@proxima.alt.za>
References: <CAHfqX-qEyTVRU_cf_a4VP3qY8Dofq5yKKFRj4eOr7kZi5p0hmw@mail.gmail.com>
	<01b425e735562b17674ddacbdca8aeaf@proxima.alt.za>
From: Stanley Lieber <stanley.lieber@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 22:21:22 -0600
Message-ID: <CAHfqX-qLVb0+yVfDU5Zsm9ws6kNxpKLcwU734AYvSc82SOR-GQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: lucio@proxima.alt.za,
	Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9vx instability
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 45edb96a-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Lucio De Re <lucio@proxima.alt.za> wrote:
>> =C2=A0I take full responsibility for the misunderstandings, though
>> I wonder why we're all so credulous when it comes to articles on
>> websites.
>
> Because that's the point of journalism. =C2=A0You ought to have made sure
> that the community affected by the article was informed about its
> inaccuracies. =C2=A0I do however appreciate your belated acknowledgements=
,
> even though I'm not sure I'm speaking for anyone else.

I probably should have posted something here. The debacle was
discussed at length amongst the 9front co-conspirators. For what it's
worth, I apologize for any negative repercussions caused by agreeing
to be interviewed by sdtimes.com.

note:

http://plan9.stanleylieber.com/9front/press/sdtimes.png

-sl