we've had discussions like this before. I do agree that having a more "original" Plan 9 option like 9legacy is a good idea. in terms of what that actually means doing, a lot of the obvious effort would be to go into turning stuff from 9front into patches for 9legacy. I started to do this to make a patch for dp9ik for 9legacy and I quickly realized how much effort that actually would take On Thu, Jan 25, 2024, 11:35 AM Don Bailey wrote: > Sometimes gatekeeping is good. It's OK if folks don't agree. > > I think it's healthy to create a strict regimen around "mainline". I am > not against 9front doing whatever it wants, I just would prefer if the two > did not merge. It's important to keep the 9 ecosystem stable, imo. > > D > > On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 1:02 PM thedaemon via 9fans <9fans@9fans.net> > wrote: > >> >> Don, you have been gate keeping this whole thread. I see noone agreeing >> with you either. We could all be a little kinder to one another, >> especially since we all have love for Plan 9. >> >> >> — thedæmon 🫠 >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 11:31 AM, Don Bailey > > wrote: >> >> Cool gaslighting. >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 12:25 PM Bakul Shah wrote: >> >>> On Jan 25, 2024, at 8:44 AM, Don Bailey wrote: >>> > >>> > I'm not sure what all this was, so I didn't read most of it. >>> > >>> > If 9front becomes the "mainline" 9, I will stop using 9 altogether. >>> Both as a user and a developer. >>> > >>> > I trust the sources that come from 9legacy/9pio but I don't have any >>> interest in the mess of whatever 9front is supposed to be. >>> >>> 9front is eminently usable. May be you are rejecting it for the wrong >>> reasons? >>> >> *9fans * / 9fans / see discussions > + participants > + delivery options > Permalink > > ------------------------------------------ 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T42f11e0265bcfa18-M94e0ddeb954440392cd96a05 Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription