From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <63ad87826698c76996628eaa50699e64@ladd.quanstro.net>
References: <53567454.2050509@gmail.com>
	<CAJ1xhMUXp74-aY9dgUdpHyOkiYee8qBGYhHjwb3cvBABYghe1g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOCRf5Vnw4gdF+T_hFKY6bi1QX3GC_bg1MBCPrt_5A4Fp41fug@mail.gmail.com>
	<f9ced5b490c82d2795014e58f54fff15@ladd.quanstro.net>
	<535810E5.1010507@gmail.com>
	<63ad87826698c76996628eaa50699e64@ladd.quanstro.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 07:15:28 +0300
Message-ID: <CAJ1xhMWna_CekxVnmMMn1dweriy2JiPNQqushfp3KYNzXDF0=A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alexander Kapshuk <alexander.kapshuk@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [9fans] writing to /dev/$winid/addr
Topicbox-Message-UUID: db4b9a9e-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

That's OK. It's actually ksh on AIX.

Thanks for your feedback anyway.


On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:34 PM, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
>> >>> #!/bin/rc
>> >>> {
>> >>>  echo 'echo $SYSNAME!`uname -n`!$USER'
>> >>>  echo 'PS1='':; '' PS2='' '''
>> >>> } >/dev/$winid/body
>> > this is not valid rc.
>> >
>> > - erik
>> >
>> If it's not too much trouble, would you mind demonstrating what valid rc
>> would be for the part of the script in question.
>
> i'm wrong of course if the shell you're running is bash,
> the script itself is reasonable rc.  i was confused by an
> rc script emitting bash.
>
> - erik
>