From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20121119151045.GA75450@intma.in> References: <7a746291161fe83e1df0401af21f6ce4@quintile.net> <20121119151045.GA75450@intma.in> Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 06:10:37 -0800 Message-ID: From: David Leimbach To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b10d0410a8f5804cf16084b Subject: Re: [9fans] c++ Topicbox-Message-UUID: e0844f20-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --047d7b10d0410a8f5804cf16084b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 7:10 AM, Kurt H Maier wrote: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 09:56:33AM -0500, Calvin Morrison wrote: > > On 19 November 2012 04:59, Steve Simon wrote: > > > > Isn't all C code valid C++? problem solved. > > > As of c99, they have diverged. > > They weren't the same in 1998 either. --047d7b10d0410a8f5804cf16084b Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Mon, N= ov 19, 2012 at 7:10 AM, Kurt H Maier <khm-9@intma.in> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 09:56:33AM -0500, Calvin Morrison= wrote:
> On 19 November 2012 04:59, Steve Simon <steve@quintile.net> wrote:
>
> Isn't all C code valid C++? problem solved= .


As of c99, they have diverged.

They weren't the same in 1998 either.
--047d7b10d0410a8f5804cf16084b--