From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAFUsep24m4jC_6kmKwramBxJv8i3cxUszjhN9oXtOEm1urPNCQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTin9RO2YeBcNM8gbcNHG7G1xPHH5vA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAG3N4d-gWftc_FgY+E=HZnXKKVm=Zer9gK0acVmGewgDiLaT2g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPzHD31RSE4W=dH_2dvEJ=ByUKtVomcvi7KPb-FSpR6=eh5Vnw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFUsep24m4jC_6kmKwramBxJv8i3cxUszjhN9oXtOEm1urPNCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 12:12:39 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJJ04x5-gO4K4Us1FGy5K6RGAkA3nko8ZmjQuiDdsSWAHbha6Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [9fans] novel userspace paradigms introduced by plan 9
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 02a709cc-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

I don't see why anyone combining ideas from Plan 9 into Linux hurts
Plan 9 as long as Plan 9 continues to exist.

On Saturday, July 16, 2011, simon softnet <ph.softnet@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please, don't let plan 9 and linux be interrelated in the future in any way ...Future plan 9 users have the opportunity to experience novel user-space paradigms.Why do they have to be sucked into the linux world?
>
> Simon
>
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Robert Seaton <seatonr@dupage.edu> wrote:
>
>> one might find http://www.glendix.org/ project interesting
>
> The project actually already uses a glendix patched kernel and much of
> my upcoming work will be focused on porting more of Plan 9's syscalls
> to the Linux kernel so that more native Plan 9 apps can be run on
> Linux. :)
>
>
>
>