From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <fa11185f-4141-4db7-abe3-bce80305fcdb@www.fastmail.com>
References: <CAFSF3XNK1rtNXqOQOLnbnKf6PfDBtpNk7yMwixjr1Of+nAQa4w@mail.gmail.com>
	<490F1740-354F-4024-827C-C42546EFCB53@quintile.net>
	<CAJSxfmLJ3tKmBScNUScqgGz2tEv5mgxLNRFcBVTxOY=QgD66YA@mail.gmail.com>
	<fa11185f-4141-4db7-abe3-bce80305fcdb@www.fastmail.com>
From: Lucio De Re <lucio.dere@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2018 05:58:22 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJQ9t7gTfVKPfo7Pb6-m1u3u3rixLXFVfK=Xtmeg9eSuOe_UXA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [9fans] sources down
Topicbox-Message-UUID: f100cc96-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On 12/29/18, David du Colombier <0intro@gmail.com> wrote:
> Actually, what I need would be an HTTP server supporting
> SNI so I could serve the appropriate certificate according to
> the requested hostname.
>
As far as I can tell (coffee still working it's way to my brain) Go's
HTTPS server does that just fine. Surely all you need is the file
server?

> The machine hosting 9legacy.org is also hosting other websites
> and currently only presents a valid X.509 certificate for 9grid.fr.
>
And, like me, you don't like using multi-domain certificates?

I think the answer is a simple one, but off the cuff, I don't have one.

Personally, I think HTTPS is overrated, or has just made itself overrated.

Lucio.