From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from tb-mx1.topicbox.com (localhost.local [127.0.0.1]) by tb-mx1.topicbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9C8CEEE7F0 for <9fans@9fans.net>; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 02:42:35 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from lucio.dere@gmail.com) Received: from tb-mx1.topicbox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tb-mx1.topicbox.com (Authentication Milter) with ESMTP id 2BCA66DCD90; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 02:42:35 -0500 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; d=topicbox.com; s=arcseal; t= 1577086955; b=cUwNtj1Zq6fkCmax0rvZg2DVwYfRaHBrWmKAw7/5tuUPXEc+PG ru9tmpOH0bUG/gFbvgBzoOEF6w+pcobTv5iuPfCU7JFYUoJiYfS76qvkBUZSVGa1 cx7bvC0nVLEHbYD1zb7YMaxQG78maCi388p5C+Vv3/W9HH8pBLWPdpd11asYJJPx 2/6muauZSW2qlaX7JGc7xi73aBuVtcZsz1RxRw8bjmzTy6xSy6ff/Dx4FZDc5ulc YIFY9StcuegO9rXW0rK55FNlbY7mELnXaG/PbW2x1yIbwG+J0q/1yCLNsNiAvhy9 arNMW+75Y5Ek3VexOFthtOWV5KLVTtzKpx6A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= topicbox.com; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; s=arcseal; t=1577086955; bh=pGSGqtVo3aY42chl58eL9HjisjJlxbTH2RMqdbynOuI=; b=CrgbdDExrmSr SobjlV2ARsOmzTEA3CmyEaW9jSfnt2dBMzpy9mle4dzqXwyNAy/EkdNojsaenRnE 6RU4crf7se1BwSOq5lv+ZNKba+nQ/Xgk7yMBFoCPZJSN6WrsLtSh/ptiTGGpkC4P TN+KeSDf6VY7JqeqkAo2Yrsgd2gZYX6fEr1/vN3wOGahEPXUu/LdvGV1Cmg8CITx C52QvDIWOJZ56CneUa82ztzpauMhTjlruk2n0K0+h2N2NHjYyx0SSeBEz2ff7Ibw 6g75/BD70cluz7Ctuzx7fZHLdNMuiHFhlZ5F7AnJDkHe4aG0CfoOsDZTl8kNye9U zyHPGD5imw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; tb-mx1.topicbox.com; arc=none (no signatures found); dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key sha256) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=FBJXLzR+ header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 x-bits=2048; dmarc=pass policy.published-domain-policy=none policy.published-subdomain-policy=quarantine policy.applied-disposition=none policy.evaluated-disposition=none (p=none,sp=quarantine,d=none,d.eval=none) policy.policy-from=p header.from=gmail.com; iprev=pass smtp.remote-ip=209.85.167.45 (mail-lf1-f45.google.com); spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lucio.dere@gmail.com smtp.helo=mail-lf1-f45.google.com; x-aligned-from=pass (Address match); x-google-dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key) header.d=1e100.net header.i=@1e100.net header.b=YkeprbN3; x-ptr=pass smtp.helo=mail-lf1-f45.google.com policy.ptr=mail-lf1-f45.google.com; x-return-mx=pass header.domain=gmail.com policy.is_org=yes (MX Record found); x-return-mx=pass smtp.domain=gmail.com policy.is_org=yes (MX Record found); x-tls=pass smtp.version=TLSv1.2 smtp.cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 smtp.bits=256/256; x-vs=clean score=0 state=0 Authentication-Results: tb-mx1.topicbox.com; arc=none (no signatures found); dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key sha256) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=FBJXLzR+ header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 x-bits=2048; dmarc=pass policy.published-domain-policy=none policy.published-subdomain-policy=quarantine policy.applied-disposition=none policy.evaluated-disposition=none (p=none,sp=quarantine,d=none,d.eval=none) policy.policy-from=p header.from=gmail.com; iprev=pass smtp.remote-ip=209.85.167.45 (mail-lf1-f45.google.com); spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lucio.dere@gmail.com smtp.helo=mail-lf1-f45.google.com; x-aligned-from=pass (Address match); x-google-dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key) header.d=1e100.net header.i=@1e100.net header.b=YkeprbN3; x-ptr=pass smtp.helo=mail-lf1-f45.google.com policy.ptr=mail-lf1-f45.google.com; x-return-mx=pass header.domain=gmail.com policy.is_org=yes (MX Record found); x-return-mx=pass smtp.domain=gmail.com policy.is_org=yes (MX Record found); x-tls=pass smtp.version=TLSv1.2 smtp.cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 smtp.bits=256/256; x-vs=clean score=0 state=0 X-ME-VSCause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrvdduledguddtjecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdp uffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepjghfhf ffkffuvfgtsehttdertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpefnuhgtihhoucffvgcutfgvuceolhhu tghiohdruggvrhgvsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmqeenucffohhmrghinhepthhophhitggsoh igrdgtohhmpdgrlhhlnhgvthgthhhinhgrrdgtnhenucfkphepvddtledrkeehrdduieej rdegheenucfrrghrrghmpehinhgvthepvddtledrkeehrdduieejrdeghedphhgvlhhope hmrghilhdqlhhfuddqfheghedrghhoohhglhgvrdgtohhmpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepoehl uhgtihhordguvghrvgesghhmrghilhdrtghomhequcfukfgkgfepgeektddunecuvehluh hsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-VSCategory: clean Received-SPF: pass (gmail.com ... _spf.google.com: Sender is authorized to use 'lucio.dere@gmail.com' in 'mfrom' identity (mechanism 'include:_netblocks.google.com' matched)) receiver=tb-mx1.topicbox.com; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from="lucio.dere@gmail.com"; helo=mail-lf1-f45.google.com; client-ip=209.85.167.45 Received: from mail-lf1-f45.google.com (mail-lf1-f45.google.com [209.85.167.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tb-mx1.topicbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS for <9fans@9fans.net>; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 02:42:35 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from lucio.dere@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf1-f45.google.com with SMTP id y1so11844229lfb.6 for <9fans@9fans.net>; Sun, 22 Dec 2019 23:42:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=pGSGqtVo3aY42chl58eL9HjisjJlxbTH2RMqdbynOuI=; b=FBJXLzR+g78JNihIwNmzvFeIFscuoKidZTL9nOWiiaBI7ZNNfNhc37fRhHYO9/kK+A 1RdxGlCLgEBjezmSohhi+jJ01q7d2dcVUFL6QIzqdlJ6wml1GUjFvh2b97wfIvnrE9b4 w7ma8Khdp5UOxaMzs+KCsWVz0jH019WLzv8uYjc5E2B08vnNRQNCe5RU4Zmz3QSCAGtG ZXh2wJzubezfOAJP4hkjMmJuLgKeqgPbqjwn9BYFeoWF8qVx9XJJSAf4LX3oIAla7+4O kH2pjgaXvcwvRPUWX8o+EdC3422vkIrwzx4J3NWlT70qVyNFhSD0MFX+jdNxZIKUG29h w5Pw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=pGSGqtVo3aY42chl58eL9HjisjJlxbTH2RMqdbynOuI=; b=YkeprbN3KR984TNmhEsAUyQeZ2TJkxxJqfwqv8W9XFu3XKT0ZHDzUX9cNGj6UIpsO3 vl0p6CYIKCRymkOKF/mhKNBVrCwN90hu/rbG5f/h2Cw+FKir3jYKHkl0iSeTzT44HphJ THBF8thie2QEKeuXnQXO3Q1FcI+muBmxMh36WXm3ZZEEngNsaaQ/YxaR6C1D82c0hh/z jgbQwvSRPeIozyg0Rc2T5oRYpOJXulnTBWB8Y1qrIAI1mfdDzL7djHZ8s5bLn82nl6rw D/f201WgDW+L949nxU9lUBeVrNNne2b7v9IqAayj/3BfnFnlx2LHYNod+KD7nT+mjgfA 7uDw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWR055R+J2vO/oGUKrcEzgDYi2rO0Y5t9Wo6mlpIzwxKs4LOqK+ +j40GJLO2oWMOJq5G2utD/X8VUowOpGjBqO2F3JQvg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxCKQarwJS69VZSSRHlxX+GAK6uXUZmPDvN1/0xDT20ctZpxvtvlIGY7GA0wtGy1d3wsNmQ1nkyOFVAxAblUxI= X-Received: by 2002:a19:4351:: with SMTP id m17mr16459083lfj.61.1577086953755; Sun, 22 Dec 2019 23:42:33 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a2e:a0c7:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Sun, 22 Dec 2019 23:42:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Lucio De Re Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 09:42:33 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [9fans] Running venti from plan9port To: 9fans <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Topicbox-Policy-Reasoning: allow: sender is a member Topicbox-Message-UUID: cc03b4a4-2557-11ea-bbf9-be1d6c2543c2 Let me make sure I'm not misrepresenting this: I have an external USB drive configured as a Venti device, it is portable to a (small) number of p9p hosts that have been configured to match its characteristics, I'm not sure if I actually verified that Plan 9 Venti can also access it. I wouldn't recommend that configuration for serious use: first I have at least one hardware error I will eventually need to address and that will take some effort; secondly, active Venti on my 32-bit linux-mint workstation causes shutting down to take tens of minutes - if Venti is not running, shutting down is as normal as one can expect; then there is this vacfs issue - which does not occur if I run vacfs on a Plan 9 workstation, to the very same Venti configuration. Having looked at the USB/SATA hat mentioned here, I confess it is even more tempting. And what looks really dishy would be the PCI/E, 5-device, ROCK-PI only hat which has only one disadvantage: Plan 9 has not (yet?) been ported to the ROCK-PI. Take a look: https://shop.allnetchina.cn/collections/frontpage/products/penta-sata-hat-for-rock-pi-4 seems like a great place to start. Lucio. On 12/21/19, Steven Stallion wrote: >> Steven, I found, on a 32-bit host, that vacfs truncated biggish to big >> files on reading them and Cinap suggested that I should look at >> possible confusion in size_t types versus 32-bit integers. I never got >> around to that, but otherwise, I have also had good service from venti >> on p9p. > > Interesting. I've only used Venti on 64-bit hosts, though I've not > tried using vacfs from Plan 9 from User Space yet. I have a couple of > large imports I pulled in from other file systems (around 30GB > uncompressed), but haven't seen a case yet where data was truncated or > otherwise corrupted when accessed by Plan 9. > >> Not that you need any corroboration from me. > > That's actually great to hear - I had always assumed I was running a > fringe configuration, but it has made offsite backup of the venti > store a much simpler affair than before. > > Cheers, > Steve > > > ------------------------------------------ > 9fans: 9fans > Permalink: > https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T1d0010397a54cc60-Mfe0d3c7613855f29900c44fb > Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription >