From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAJQ9t7iWn2bhixQs7Z2JoCSOpZjEc9zZbOhrj5QoBLY6jejq8w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJQ9t7gZN9pwtyzzzgq2hwLYKPsuMtKWPbf3Swzq2FBCwKYPhw@mail.gmail.com>
	<89FDB329-B008-41C3-BAB2-3B8B801BE9B2@gmail.com>
	<CAJQ9t7iKLcv956VZUgEN_ZLjR1_1mu_K+H2zADqKNR2PvSnGvg@mail.gmail.com>
	<02f5fc7d-bf68-4f91-ab82-6b79d6cebe99@posteo.net>
	<CAJQ9t7iWn2bhixQs7Z2JoCSOpZjEc9zZbOhrj5QoBLY6jejq8w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lucio De Re <lucio.dere@gmail.com>
Date: Sat,  1 Sep 2018 16:49:19 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJQ9t7hkV-A8_M_P2YfCuePGC-7iMPCsVt2ycaDKp2_oVSdsog@mail.gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9P or better file services for multiple platforms
Topicbox-Message-UUID: df23e9a4-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On 9/1/18, Lucio De Re <lucio.dere@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Trying it out, it fails to find "attach" and there is no clue where
> that should come from. It did strike me as complex, but if it serves
> an NFS filesystem, that is probably adequate.
>
> I'll wait to pass judgement for after I have it actually serving
> anything at all.
>
I have made some progress, /tmp/9/ (the missing link, it seems) and
/mnt/ now look the same, so presumably something is going on. Maybe
the overengineering isn't too top-heavy, I need to check.

Lucio.