From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <15DEF730-C183-4328-A173-24773B6BCCC0@me.com> From: Lucio De Re Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2019 16:31:18 +0200 Message-ID: To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [9fans] Fujitsu D3401 Topicbox-Message-UUID: f6062f88-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On 2/16/19, Skip Tavakkolian wrote: > for completeness, AWS is also an option. there's is an old image that > Richard Miller created some time ago. Erik mentioned he hoped (was > planning?) to create an image with up-to-date drivers. > Now, Erik's track record is pretty much faultless, so I'd love to see an image reflecting recent developments, if any (I really ought to be the one driving this, I have good reason to apply some effort in this direction). But I am curious to hear what improvements drivers there may be for an AWS image. When I started writing this, I assumed these would be additional drivers, which didn't seem logical. Updated drivers, on the other hand, would be very welcome, specially from someone close to the coalface. And on that note, I'd like to start a catalogue of drivers for Plan 9 with sufficient documentation to ensure that they are or can be made portable or compatible across what I hesitate to call distros. If there is a shortcut to identifying the incompatibilities between various kernel versions, no one is more qualified than cinap, quanstro and forsyth to catalogue them. Is it worth it and if so, where should I start? Lucio.