From: Lucio De Re <lucio.dere@gmail.com>
To: 9fans <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] factotum vs. SASL+TLS+applications
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 09:41:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJQ9t7iSVNaepFvPeJHoFRGtLoHmhHuGP9HgFfTsU6w0aTPRGQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f4e59c0999eded17@orthanc.ca>
And work under p9p. Me too! Plug in a proper X-based WM and I can get
some performance out of my rather dated equipment again.
Lucio.
On 1/24/20, Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca> wrote:
> The following is all hypothetical. I'm curious about how people
> think auth(2)/factotum(4) could be adapted to support the use
> case ...
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-24 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-24 6:12 Lyndon Nerenberg
2020-01-24 7:41 ` Lucio De Re [this message]
2020-01-24 10:08 ` [9fans] " hiro
2020-01-27 19:52 ` Ori Bernstein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJQ9t7iSVNaepFvPeJHoFRGtLoHmhHuGP9HgFfTsU6w0aTPRGQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=lucio.dere@gmail.com \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).