Most certainly not. I called him Jacob in my first response, but that was followed by someone using the surname and I thought I had originally got the surname wrong, probably by reading it wrong in the incoming message. I did consider being wrong, but I thought someone would correct me. Now you did. My apologies to Jacob, first, and second to anyone else who may have found my behaviour offensive, Lucio. On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 2:39 PM thedaemon via 9fans <9fans@9fans.net> wrote: > His name is Moody, you keep spelling it differently in what I can only > assume is a passive aggressive way to insult him? > > — thedæmon > > On Friday, May 10th, 2024 at 6:53 AM, Lucio De Re > wrote: > > I am not allowed to ignore some advice when Vic raises a much more > interesting subject matter and does it in a perfectly justified and well > formulated fashion - and gets accused of being an AI or at minimum playing > one on 9fans? > > How do you know that I did not follow any of Moodley's advice, which > incidentally I acknowledged I may not be competent to follow? None of the > legacy people I have noted responding have been even remotely as offensive > as those who are determined to deify 9front in legacy's place - when there > is no effort on legacy's side to promote our particular preference, nor to > justify such preference as being superior in any manner. > > What I notice - correct me if I am mistaken - is that any comparison > between 9front and 9legacy seems to needle a few members (very few, there > are many names from that community that have not participated, specifically > the ones I know hand have long respectes, ask them) of the 9front community > that seem to take offence unless 9front is painted in a better light. I > guess that's permissible, but please mind your manners if you choose to go > that route, this is 9fans and 9front I believe has its own discussion > groups. > > Lucio. > > On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 12:22 PM qwx via 9fans <9fans@9fans.net> wrote: > >> On Fri May 10 11:09:32 +0200 2024, lucio.dere@gmail.com wrote: >> >> > I'm finding it ironic, though, that the defenders of the true 9front >> faith >> > find it necessary to insult their "enemies" in a forum dedicated to the >> > very subject matter they are so disapproving of. Surely they realise >> that >> > 9fans is a stupid place to do so? >> > >> > Lucio. >> >> Several people, including 9front users, have tried to help you and >> provided you with ways to accomplish your task; they have been so far >> ignored. Even Moody himself gave you alternatives and arguably easier >> ways to do it. Here's another one: mycroftiv's ANTS was in sync with >> 9front for a while and fully supports fossil; it is now out of date >> but the last ANTS release will probably work on your hardware. iirc >> noam had also tried to update it based on latest 9front some time >> ago, but I'm not sure where that lives. >> >> You have everything you need, courtesy of your "enemies", the >> "defenders of the true 9front faith", whatever that is supposed to >> mean. What have you tried so far, did it work? >> >> Thanks, >> qwx > > > -- > Lucio De Re > 2 Piet Retief St > Kestell (Eastern Free State) > 9860 South Africa > > Ph.: +27 58 653 1433 > Cell: +27 83 251 5824 > > > *9fans * / 9fans / see discussions > + participants > + delivery options > Permalink > > -- Lucio De Re 2 Piet Retief St Kestell (Eastern Free State) 9860 South Africa Ph.: +27 58 653 1433 Cell: +27 83 251 5824 ------------------------------------------ 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Tcf128fa955b8aafc-Md673c9d1e7254a50932e772a Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription