From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from tb-mx0.topicbox.com (localhost.local [127.0.0.1]) by tb-mx0.topicbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5B60B23903 for <9fans@9fans.net>; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 23:29:10 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lucio.dere@gmail.com) Received: from tb-mx0.topicbox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tb-mx0.topicbox.com (Authentication Milter) with ESMTP id 8173DFAB2F4; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 23:29:10 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; d=topicbox.com; s=arcseal; t= 1602127750; b=ma5esK3Uv5kfapp57s238+MrASzc2NItyOEPRGOY9UzfuTTpim srvGBN60tu6yPy1shWebAb72IuM4FGpZ3Gqoa1ixpFA1I/56NyQKwQ+k2Tt32X6Q RnFycOmC+fl19HHpwZevNyzm7bhfi93pjmHneXrpy7cA5N/V6AKf5Aujbd+kqGtt yy7/0H38/fzv/yyrYet3QQ63+lYPYeFdqfAoPkXvpnWZZhs3gX3L+15OmtVC2NKX eYk/KA/1KGsVbSLRXDxZoYXu/aiLqOzZhDKridz7pEYwDx1nCPsOiA8twT9EDDNp OgsZbTP5YzQgbK2cr0lMxCmn/e1AH4ypue3w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= topicbox.com; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; s=arcseal; t=1602127750; bh=jnJh6sXEIu4l09bh5+Nvyc5KqfOnWi5pSOtqgRCmfy8=; b=YxpWCMmBNJlp yhrGMlILF98VdT+StCuUDFqGSpC99ld6XAFaxdaGWTdLKlLCCIpbn6dBs0S1p5nj WvNi7E1mIYK6K7zTdiA1TgByoY0NQAMGwD3qaykPiA3xjlM8CP4lr2qsp8uQgt9D /XnM9TWLSAXSGX9CfhgMgagJ2no/YXHYTzHZ6bfAn9SYp3fKvaL8i9hW/TawLQp3 L2Rnv0CeKB0Y9s0ZyNUXORADDDX/q38JbbW/rFjYTq9x/UEijmC6VL6rZgHk3tXc 2qNNFFlQvoJwrNktpjfTtLef1ppSk5jpLf6EwQ17q96pNecwO8c+29BP7kO4VCDh A3Xhpvu/Pg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; tb-mx0.topicbox.com; arc=none (no signatures found); bimi=none (Domain is not BIMI enabled); dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key sha256) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=LKveNFNY header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 x-bits=2048; dmarc=pass policy.published-domain-policy=none policy.published-subdomain-policy=quarantine policy.applied-disposition=none policy.evaluated-disposition=none (p=none,sp=quarantine,d=none,d.eval=none) policy.policy-from=p header.from=gmail.com; iprev=pass smtp.remote-ip=209.85.167.48 (mail-lf1-f48.google.com); spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lucio.dere@gmail.com smtp.helo=mail-lf1-f48.google.com; x-aligned-from=pass (Address match); x-google-dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key) header.d=1e100.net header.i=@1e100.net header.b=DPzEqThh; x-ptr=pass smtp.helo=mail-lf1-f48.google.com policy.ptr=mail-lf1-f48.google.com; x-return-mx=pass header.domain=gmail.com policy.is_org=yes (MX Records found: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com); x-return-mx=pass smtp.domain=gmail.com policy.is_org=yes (MX Records found: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com); x-tls=pass smtp.version=TLSv1.2 smtp.cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 smtp.bits=256/256; x-vs=clean score=0 state=0 Authentication-Results: tb-mx0.topicbox.com; arc=none (no signatures found); bimi=none (Domain is not BIMI enabled); dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key sha256) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=LKveNFNY header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 x-bits=2048; dmarc=pass policy.published-domain-policy=none policy.published-subdomain-policy=quarantine policy.applied-disposition=none policy.evaluated-disposition=none (p=none,sp=quarantine,d=none,d.eval=none) policy.policy-from=p header.from=gmail.com; iprev=pass smtp.remote-ip=209.85.167.48 (mail-lf1-f48.google.com); spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lucio.dere@gmail.com smtp.helo=mail-lf1-f48.google.com; x-aligned-from=pass (Address match); x-google-dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key) header.d=1e100.net header.i=@1e100.net header.b=DPzEqThh; x-ptr=pass smtp.helo=mail-lf1-f48.google.com policy.ptr=mail-lf1-f48.google.com; x-return-mx=pass header.domain=gmail.com policy.is_org=yes (MX Records found: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com); x-return-mx=pass smtp.domain=gmail.com policy.is_org=yes (MX Records found: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com); x-tls=pass smtp.version=TLSv1.2 smtp.cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 smtp.bits=256/256; x-vs=clean score=0 state=0 X-ME-VSCause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrgeejgdejvdculddtuddrgeduhedrtddtmd cutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggftfghn shhusghstghrihgsvgdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtne cunecujfgurhepjghfhfffkffuvfgtsehttdertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpefnuhgtihho ucffvgcutfgvuceolhhutghiohdruggvrhgvsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpeffvdegieektedtkefhhedvheevheethffhtdfhjeegtdduudeiheeltdef feeivdenucfkphepvddtledrkeehrdduieejrdegkeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpe dtnecurfgrrhgrmhepihhnvghtpedvtdelrdekhedrudeijedrgeekpdhhvghlohepmhgr ihhlqdhlfhduqdhfgeekrdhgohhoghhlvgdrtghomhdpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpeeolhhutg hiohdruggvrhgvsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmqecuuffkkgfgpeefieeffe X-ME-VSScore: 0 X-ME-VSCategory: clean Received-SPF: pass (gmail.com ... _spf.google.com: Sender is authorized to use 'lucio.dere@gmail.com' in 'mfrom' identity (mechanism 'include:_netblocks.google.com' matched)) receiver=tb-mx0.topicbox.com; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from="lucio.dere@gmail.com"; helo=mail-lf1-f48.google.com; client-ip=209.85.167.48 Received: from mail-lf1-f48.google.com (mail-lf1-f48.google.com [209.85.167.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tb-mx0.topicbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS for <9fans@9fans.net>; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 23:29:09 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lucio.dere@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf1-f48.google.com with SMTP id a9so4818735lfc.7 for <9fans@9fans.net>; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 20:29:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=jnJh6sXEIu4l09bh5+Nvyc5KqfOnWi5pSOtqgRCmfy8=; b=LKveNFNYpzSLKJl/XLki0lV3V7XO6w7SPzSin7HfOBb9Er+cSdgT+yatS7TAPfhCx1 hBiuoo41VONOHozBQbWrfGP6iUGQA0qkR8p/SR7fcOwKIlaYOnhjOuzFIbAL8AzagB/7 a/VnHt4bQw+MElBKp6wnt7VJJBPzMniK4C/hBGQtPE6Lb5A1PvUwAJ2swlJ76DHnY+It s9XIgEEjwz3r1pae1jtYLNTCrqR7sxiYFT0T22IjqqW+QmiuVz/riOWjACZrP/SA9g6X ViKA2rw6y/N0B/uUh6CVAvVo3mTVBHDWjEOddX/39kp7mjwYVdP5SPmA7VEtNwIeE5Zp anJg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jnJh6sXEIu4l09bh5+Nvyc5KqfOnWi5pSOtqgRCmfy8=; b=DPzEqThh9JaCFhxjEZ99Bv/RGPm9wZz7TdCfxoijPRziHRFvWa0q+SGcRmvU0vUhqS QLfBgHUkqkcHmfiOcK7CifFEZkSUZ1Dn7sS2/CXEkSasWKsc4hzDa54K7pu/ifixRKob hGfZpi1ii7FUXI0xkLiRJQuGeWdTBqgfEG9rJi6olEcSijtKWpfK19zMMZI40s7+9A9/ EUN5eukAcg6F/OT2as8o9u5HZT9v/EtSeioJUUipxIEyg4U72BlFYY+ititK+uOkdqWE 5HaKVfOPZXp6Wx30Vuo6qT7zSQUqanw5fM+/9qQI2rcbva2DvmSCsfEML6s0iqc+fwVC 3K5Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531odfWuTl/jm6PH6uJk7C0lZKfY0moKg/2SRVbdJgGEAAlLvzeK F4FNM9GEEe6qr+FGM7jCfv8/K2Wlc0jQRQNOBAw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwsbJsiH1Zrg9+2PDh67cxOwS+0E+jpRwzKNEiGqh3AVfdPkONXoJNS8B5xK2JeCIH5+JYByviJjcxyb9l4yjI= X-Received: by 2002:a19:87d7:: with SMTP id j206mr1714263lfd.213.1602127747874; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 20:29:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a2e:b4d3:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 20:29:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Lucio De Re Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2020 05:29:06 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [9fans] Flakey DNS server To: ori@eigenstate.org Cc: 9fans@9fans.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Topicbox-Policy-Reasoning: allow: sender is a member Topicbox-Message-UUID: 72320ef0-0916-11eb-9aeb-c9b8ec34f5d3 On 10/8/20, ori@eigenstate.org wrote: >> So the big question, before I commit to something I may not be >> competent to fix: what is recommended by those in the know? > > You've written a lot of text here, but none of it describes > what exactly is flaky. I'd recommend describing the flakiness > in more detail. > I'm sorry I didn't phrase what I wanted to know properly. I can tell if 9front has a fixed version of ndb/dns or not myself, I know where it is "broken". For social rather than technical reasons, I am more interested in how compatibly the no doubt improved version of the server has been altered. I have at least a partial answer: (a) the updated server, compiled under Labs (not quite legacy) runs pretty much identically - no differences in operation that I could report and (b) the same Bad rrattach magic: 0x60 - previous -0x21524542 message appears in the logs and causes an assert exception. Which is what I have been unable to fix in the past. Or determine if it's something I can fix by tidying up a very bloated network database. That said, thanks to all who have replied to me, it has been informative and encouraging. Lucio.