From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAFSF3XMVEpbAhyG-LbjRnTohrhxndoHPjGO+_Zm1vwZmLMzPEQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJQ9t7gZN9pwtyzzzgq2hwLYKPsuMtKWPbf3Swzq2FBCwKYPhw@mail.gmail.com>
	<89FDB329-B008-41C3-BAB2-3B8B801BE9B2@gmail.com>
	<1535826761.2639612.1493636488.3B1D204B@webmail.messagingengine.com>
	<CAFSF3XMVEpbAhyG-LbjRnTohrhxndoHPjGO+_Zm1vwZmLMzPEQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lucio De Re <lucio.dere@gmail.com>
Date: Sun,  2 Sep 2018 13:22:57 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJQ9t7j-m9HadiJ8jUyOd6Uo36wKfxhU_7-7nRhU3j=KHrf0Hw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9P or better file services for multiple platforms
Topicbox-Message-UUID: df725e22-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On 9/1/18, hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote:
> no, 9p2000.L or Linux syscalls are not supported by plan9.
>
>
So Ethan is right, this is a "lark", if an interesting one. 9P is
getting quite a few "takers". I seem to recall a paper on adding Plan
9 authentication to the Linux kernel, for purposes beyond the Plan 9
scope? That also needed 9P features.

Lucio.