From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from tb-mx1.topicbox.com (localhost.local [127.0.0.1]) by tb-mx1.topicbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B390913F1B4F for <9fans@9fans.net>; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 09:39:40 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from lucio.dere@gmail.com) Received: from tb-mx1.topicbox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tb-mx1.topicbox.com (Authentication Milter) with ESMTP id 982A7A90BEE; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 09:39:40 -0500 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; d=topicbox.com; s=arcseal; t= 1580654380; b=glK/Ikmrwqw4WwONcYWY7P6GgEslOktHpr493BQeCQrhLD+IiB Y/op1/R1zLu2sWbWr5lTJG7HUob/e7jldd2SGA1h2wYP4135HO/uz+0+kTaq+Zhi DNcp7pO7XseOBkUKiTPnp5VIvpFb+g/ZBPZCtAQnyZ4CIOMFuFWya8eDGQ3umCgL ZXpzNvznX1xgnNVuGFibNCQ6KIYdEfxyfcrHA7Trv6vo3MF0G80PPyoOBeYwKs2R E5kGzgLeWVlOo/xGEpiEi0MhFCALwwbdHwR2fvCRRKgPH4qzOVi6SBbxuFhB5yTK kYxhe74Td1ItSBvqKq08L7Tl7uAlZ5OBIDFw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= topicbox.com; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; s=arcseal; t=1580654380; bh=dj3ejQwV2OUjmovW7fFhxVpmWesZgTzt3uiDH6c/M4k=; b=BXNVsKCMy0HC nSct3Aova7X5iCwvrh/pEkFMQTU86qjxZv5nEOrzDa0HtFsOg/hsCnKPBWGNNzW1 yTnqkY/ncrApC+ff7zZ4iHSP50uIK+BlBOwRyEG8oEY1i3nKlKIMj/eAOt1Xp1r7 U9Xtf/2Easb+S2S8P0R4n8fUuSsavJNSDSkGanQT7Pz+o/1EA3MW9D+Ur8qYSPwd 5+yY3hCz0dE8AzHXxShuEixVRmRzmtWLESVA1LHEO8u5PWkQSnp7LWGs9Py6acXK X+V4b0Nq3ksqPGY5xFCPAa6US0nW/brNNiVzRprq72N+VNQmIT0VG08NRA7TaS8I /QmEsUCWFw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; tb-mx1.topicbox.com; arc=none (no signatures found); bimi=none (Domain is not BIMI enabled); dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key sha256) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=BEmu3nDL header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 x-bits=2048; dmarc=pass policy.published-domain-policy=none policy.published-subdomain-policy=quarantine policy.applied-disposition=none policy.evaluated-disposition=none (p=none,sp=quarantine,d=none,d.eval=none) policy.policy-from=p header.from=gmail.com; iprev=pass smtp.remote-ip=209.85.208.178 (mail-lj1-f178.google.com); spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lucio.dere@gmail.com smtp.helo=mail-lj1-f178.google.com; x-aligned-from=pass (Address match); x-google-dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key) header.d=1e100.net header.i=@1e100.net header.b=PZwChWyy; x-ptr=pass smtp.helo=mail-lj1-f178.google.com policy.ptr=mail-lj1-f178.google.com; x-return-mx=pass header.domain=gmail.com policy.is_org=yes (MX Records found: alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com); x-return-mx=pass smtp.domain=gmail.com policy.is_org=yes (MX Records found: alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com); x-tls=pass smtp.version=TLSv1.2 smtp.cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 smtp.bits=256/256; x-vs=clean score=30 state=0 Authentication-Results: tb-mx1.topicbox.com; arc=none (no signatures found); bimi=none (Domain is not BIMI enabled); dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key sha256) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=BEmu3nDL header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 x-bits=2048; dmarc=pass policy.published-domain-policy=none policy.published-subdomain-policy=quarantine policy.applied-disposition=none policy.evaluated-disposition=none (p=none,sp=quarantine,d=none,d.eval=none) policy.policy-from=p header.from=gmail.com; iprev=pass smtp.remote-ip=209.85.208.178 (mail-lj1-f178.google.com); spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lucio.dere@gmail.com smtp.helo=mail-lj1-f178.google.com; x-aligned-from=pass (Address match); x-google-dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key) header.d=1e100.net header.i=@1e100.net header.b=PZwChWyy; x-ptr=pass smtp.helo=mail-lj1-f178.google.com policy.ptr=mail-lj1-f178.google.com; x-return-mx=pass header.domain=gmail.com policy.is_org=yes (MX Records found: alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com); x-return-mx=pass smtp.domain=gmail.com policy.is_org=yes (MX Records found: alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com); x-tls=pass smtp.version=TLSv1.2 smtp.cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 smtp.bits=256/256; x-vs=clean score=30 state=0 X-ME-VSCause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrgeehgdeiiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdpuffr tefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecufghrlhcuvffnffculdeftd dmnecujfgurhepjghfhfffkffuvfgtsehttdertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpefnuhgtihho ucffvgcutfgvuceolhhutghiohdruggvrhgvsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmqeenucffohhmrg hinhepfhhfrdgtohdriigrnecukfhppedvtdelrdekhedrvddtkedrudejkeenucevlhhu shhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepihhnvghtpedvtdelrdekhedrvddtkedrud ejkedphhgvlhhopehmrghilhdqlhhjuddqfhdujeekrdhgohhoghhlvgdrtghomhdpmhgr ihhlfhhrohhmpeeolhhutghiohdruggvrhgvsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmqecuuffkkgfgpe efvddule X-ME-VSScore: 30 X-ME-VSCategory: clean Received-SPF: pass (gmail.com ... _spf.google.com: Sender is authorized to use 'lucio.dere@gmail.com' in 'mfrom' identity (mechanism 'include:_netblocks.google.com' matched)) receiver=tb-mx1.topicbox.com; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from="lucio.dere@gmail.com"; helo=mail-lj1-f178.google.com; client-ip=209.85.208.178 Received: from mail-lj1-f178.google.com (mail-lj1-f178.google.com [209.85.208.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tb-mx1.topicbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS for <9fans@9fans.net>; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 09:39:40 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from lucio.dere@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lj1-f178.google.com with SMTP id x14so11872079ljd.13 for <9fans@9fans.net>; Sun, 02 Feb 2020 06:39:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=dj3ejQwV2OUjmovW7fFhxVpmWesZgTzt3uiDH6c/M4k=; b=BEmu3nDLwy8I165ns5RFFCkPDJl5QejSCnICZAytoEiNc/ZYTKeZLk2kkjKLS0x2py GFBgagl5n03JyvW1Tz9c0lu8US4y51C92L7y4P6yb+O+wNHJ+0VgCrMZ9JvA5i+CvUzB SGD+FnpJKLHNFoaxW3SVEx0QJyw4NFxJqQYo2Mq3S6zvIwxf646r7Zl/em9XCMOkdNkr l5GXkEXIOituL2EEMKwEdmJde+m5qjC8kmPHPyVtWYSC/GcdKqII1ZRgQFN+G95qxogk IQhJ3wNGTl5Ceq3fJXfTVaAreorvmdtMj5pecPxQPOmSRZgJRjlef/PiFtt1kNOA/rXR +zRQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=dj3ejQwV2OUjmovW7fFhxVpmWesZgTzt3uiDH6c/M4k=; b=PZwChWyyWwxOIfhjgBaFGM6VOe0USJ+2Oti/0FwyXYnZxDLDwDEX2y6muYarVXGDFD 1IY5JBSvIEm9RTxjGRs6pqAFbgy9neSqohHm4YZHCSHGNFih/CAHeUWIJbK3B0Yw11ri c3Om9KzuEwe325u3izQT0XFgSt6qbmzpd0D0vyd8MUnoUgiBXHbcGtqxxK1XPuqFoVAL YYVbBs/xx/CAwNcsDfiEJhqbx6dQBmKn2Y/mBcUOURDh6w9J9yO/0YSo3kf3AY5xUdTl coyzkti4NNj9DjB/q6wRn+c+/z9z9dyNHL4QnJdzMi++L6ORrWAGyT1o93oF3cfyJctt Zlmg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWdrMAG8L7TrkRUl3WTsfpYeqEuU1Kcg0FOuQRHsevz4qfabdGj RYRGNKyT245ShXtxLSaAgnFiqpZIKxD8bkglJHTYS9Cb X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqza9sQBvR3sWRrZwd0DVJ5ArMMMVOEAvCiFGEWt263u/lI/5toqwvdDdnmWIZBbKbkYDBMOQxho7N81ik2dGI4= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8758:: with SMTP id q24mr11475751ljj.157.1580654378525; Sun, 02 Feb 2020 06:39:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a2e:956:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Feb 2020 06:39:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <482068010F236F7F53DF473D6801472C@a-b.xyz> References: <482068010F236F7F53DF473D6801472C@a-b.xyz> From: Lucio De Re Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2020 16:39:38 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [9fans] Getting git9 -- moved to github. To: 9fans <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Topicbox-Policy-Reasoning: allow: sender is a member Topicbox-Message-UUID: dabee4cc-45c9-11ea-8347-83a6ff1b56e5 On 2/2/20, kvik@a-b.xyz wrote: >> git/fetch git+ssh://git@git.ff.co.za:23456/waspa/console.git > > The port can be specified natively through the dialstring technology: > > git/fetch git+ssh://git@net!git.ff.co.za!23456/waspa/console.git > > It may be useful to add support to git9 for translating :port notation > to a dialstring; there's no need to change ssh.c. > Given that I could not find a -p option for ssh and I seldom use Plan 9 networking off the beaten path, so the "net!host!port" did not come to mind, the hour it took to modify the ssh.c code seemed well spent. I'm sure other will find it familiar, even in the user@host:port format. No reason to swim against that stream. That is, in support of the ssh change. Also surprisingly small and non-invasive. Lucio.