From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from tb-mx1.topicbox.com (localhost.local [127.0.0.1]) by tb-mx1.topicbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3265D14E2C08 for <9fans@9fans.net>; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 06:10:41 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from lucio.dere@gmail.com) Received: from tb-mx1.topicbox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tb-mx1.topicbox.com (Authentication Milter) with ESMTP id 8E4D58D0B7A; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 06:10:41 -0500 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; d=topicbox.com; s=arcseal; t= 1580728241; b=QaAyuCJ9rAVvZ8juC4BlZP0TE42gAA2lhelv0/3Qy8c3syUUue Q9aODLEmUX1Pc2zcVh8GSNVlxF0iUt414L7JX9XqNDh/5cSXpvCxypuFl4qy0MFU LONonftqvveSmTP6KdHWQZc0k6SQ+6H4cO9HxokrukI2Qn89ibuzWUuQITK4ZO0A ZShsjCtxTZ3w8MBj8uZQot0AQL2xr1+ipa2yVDNggAaYVHS4QnlJhNG+w4Sc3xva bpXhBS3Z6zXIJhRxpsiBg55fpy/EBwDLYXD6PhtkdvCIWo7CHBLi3Qv/fgI/Wkqp ahXmswp2tENE6tnWbDW4AODAW6YGcUxVk2EQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= topicbox.com; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; s=arcseal; t=1580728241; bh=02KBQt9uTB8CdLBAULfBZkyC6HSESy2v9DDcIseAvwI=; b=OmU3EX5ZcRiT FE0UQI8I1+cGtp0W5weQSAA6sXJg/qN3G4GJ/OVLwIjVTbChJfQbBq+jp/blZmjd Xv0WdEwxuTSyM20hpy4cPxdR7QHAT3luYAa9dUzsLcfLBMKTaOs3DZiiup2Mb/cg kMejUV08Qfqo8oi01jw4/l20RYqWurELTlA+ymA/O2riRRDdd+FcBYu2oxINVOIA /z1jcKXEtBRdOvKi6/XdEPQgES9mJgeeBBgiaqYXwALMvlURJqsHjpgx8MhWZ4pd XZJ5FKYnMIueWEakMw5+IWcKrQzuul1ypbJW4gDDN7VKg2gwamCRpavDCqsb3dnl cIiUKvjBUQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; tb-mx1.topicbox.com; arc=none (no signatures found); bimi=none (Domain is not BIMI enabled); dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key sha256) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=TeKr8V7y header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 x-bits=2048; dmarc=pass policy.published-domain-policy=none policy.published-subdomain-policy=quarantine policy.applied-disposition=none policy.evaluated-disposition=none (p=none,sp=quarantine,d=none,d.eval=none) policy.policy-from=p header.from=gmail.com; iprev=pass smtp.remote-ip=209.85.167.48 (mail-lf1-f48.google.com); spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lucio.dere@gmail.com smtp.helo=mail-lf1-f48.google.com; x-aligned-from=pass (Address match); x-google-dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key) header.d=1e100.net header.i=@1e100.net header.b=NOOGBy8+; x-ptr=pass smtp.helo=mail-lf1-f48.google.com policy.ptr=mail-lf1-f48.google.com; x-return-mx=pass header.domain=gmail.com policy.is_org=yes (MX Records found: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com); x-return-mx=pass smtp.domain=gmail.com policy.is_org=yes (MX Records found: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com); x-tls=pass smtp.version=TLSv1.2 smtp.cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 smtp.bits=256/256; x-vs=clean score=0 state=0 Authentication-Results: tb-mx1.topicbox.com; arc=none (no signatures found); bimi=none (Domain is not BIMI enabled); dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key sha256) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=TeKr8V7y header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 x-bits=2048; dmarc=pass policy.published-domain-policy=none policy.published-subdomain-policy=quarantine policy.applied-disposition=none policy.evaluated-disposition=none (p=none,sp=quarantine,d=none,d.eval=none) policy.policy-from=p header.from=gmail.com; iprev=pass smtp.remote-ip=209.85.167.48 (mail-lf1-f48.google.com); spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lucio.dere@gmail.com smtp.helo=mail-lf1-f48.google.com; x-aligned-from=pass (Address match); x-google-dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key) header.d=1e100.net header.i=@1e100.net header.b=NOOGBy8+; x-ptr=pass smtp.helo=mail-lf1-f48.google.com policy.ptr=mail-lf1-f48.google.com; x-return-mx=pass header.domain=gmail.com policy.is_org=yes (MX Records found: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com); x-return-mx=pass smtp.domain=gmail.com policy.is_org=yes (MX Records found: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com); x-tls=pass smtp.version=TLSv1.2 smtp.cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 smtp.bits=256/256; x-vs=clean score=0 state=0 X-ME-VSCause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrgeejgddvfecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdpuffr tefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepjghfhfffkf fuvfgtsehttdertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpefnuhgtihhoucffvgcutfgvuceolhhutghi ohdruggvrhgvsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmqeenucfkphepvddtledrkeehrdduieejrdegke enucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepihhnvghtpedvtdelrdekhedr udeijedrgeekpdhhvghlohepmhgrihhlqdhlfhduqdhfgeekrdhgohhoghhlvgdrtghomh dpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpeeolhhutghiohdruggvrhgvsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmqecuuffk kgfgpeefudekge X-ME-VSScore: 0 X-ME-VSCategory: clean Received-SPF: pass (gmail.com ... _spf.google.com: Sender is authorized to use 'lucio.dere@gmail.com' in 'mfrom' identity (mechanism 'include:_netblocks.google.com' matched)) receiver=tb-mx1.topicbox.com; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from="lucio.dere@gmail.com"; helo=mail-lf1-f48.google.com; client-ip=209.85.167.48 Received: from mail-lf1-f48.google.com (mail-lf1-f48.google.com [209.85.167.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tb-mx1.topicbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS for <9fans@9fans.net>; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 06:10:40 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from lucio.dere@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf1-f48.google.com with SMTP id m30so9377498lfp.8 for <9fans@9fans.net>; Mon, 03 Feb 2020 03:10:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=02KBQt9uTB8CdLBAULfBZkyC6HSESy2v9DDcIseAvwI=; b=TeKr8V7yGxV+5Pg5qFIZBpOj/G8T2nR9ajwky3uYwN7HrmFJrChKstTOQzQFPTHeFG ExARW8KH83hovJv1F39nUvZYVysI/0ZKey97OUmLySLJ+sr6CRM1gRIr63k0l4pdngUc ET6jvrlzrKpf463yydbnqkzWhA7jkuwfaPBm0xrNvyFDiypnOrIdPHEOQzSgmmxSYCrC NDpN8mHJL0bnWap2IC9u8ufnClFLqg1hfjjJap5sYlgavrbokWFim899WFrN2BBVoGKf v+kuT/ogXsIIOhn68gYU4yN3WMTln54geiM8zqXXfNpMbAu+6eTzw9Dg7J5+gb6VcuS6 EbGA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=02KBQt9uTB8CdLBAULfBZkyC6HSESy2v9DDcIseAvwI=; b=NOOGBy8+VMKkYJFnl4BzbXEsmdtM7DV1M54cNB6nJHCLhLBsaw3qq+yJ42PIxwwpV7 CR5x5KQ3ubgPnLC2Mr8rprGOaLqORdsEUWaCJyWwE4kkc/V7mp001OVjM279Svz3oyAO aw+6KylzlFTYo6ndcdqA0uQkXdeyhWP5RhZ5OBp9asGmI7gS2iiEDMBnJGkzjWz9Ygn5 aRV5a7LoyDgMiqvyBil3oNHGdTAzcMfpvh2Et0x1wLm7ErmohEkqqd/63PKFvaZHVE6W oNBnOQ0NgU25Hj5tV4Iqh8UmUQxX47YzQ1kabV9wLj9P4eNo1kfGxA7R5Z4NTVgurPAp uFJQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXvMEoX2PF6Yf9o846kN0GIwtOB7pR++TrdjOx1oNkAUuPrTXJ6 QRz+4Op1uNhi+MOd2L5fU0J7nZsSvHjtWtXYoLo4dbJy X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxu4EVQSoOhKNUSlRZ7FGh16vSlKB/Q0WxYqeWOEgCgftMY8KRxu0+9V0J7YC+/99Ui5Oza5XTLvxwYRpAITKk= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4199:: with SMTP id z25mr11893890lfh.26.1580728238454; Mon, 03 Feb 2020 03:10:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a2e:956:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 03:10:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <00BF6A37730ADB3A0B18AEEBC1377ADF@eigenstate.org> From: Lucio De Re Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2020 13:10:37 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [9fans] Getting git9 -- moved to github. To: 9fans <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Topicbox-Policy-Reasoning: allow: sender is a member Topicbox-Message-UUID: d39ea5e0-4675-11ea-9d30-80fe7096b273 On 2/3/20, hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote: > > since plan9 is different we already have host!port, changing one > program to host:port without changing all the others does not seem > consistent to me. > I can't argue with that point, except that the ! notation had escaped me altogether, whereas the : notation is very familiar. The reason I won't offer to make an effort towards a general approach is that I'm not sure we won't come up against potential snags or conflicts. If one can be sure that the risk does not exist, then a single network address parsing function becomes a possibility. Lucio.