From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4a804e5865b0ed4b5032260a5ba8915b@brasstown.quanstro.net> References: <9757c30398b4845438fc053ac20b187f@rei2.9hal> <4a804e5865b0ed4b5032260a5ba8915b@brasstown.quanstro.net> Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 10:22:13 +1000 Message-ID: From: Bruce Ellis To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [9fans] carriage returns in 9term and acme Topicbox-Message-UUID: b8e0e6ea-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 Perhaps decwriter(1) should be on someone's list. Then we can all not-sleep at night. And if things are running too fast the 110 baud switch could be used. brucee On 13 September 2012 10:15, erik quanstrom wrote: > On Wed Sep 12 20:13:38 EDT 2012, skip.tavakkolian@gmail.com wrote: >> without a LF how will the sprockets pulling the screen up vt(1) get activated? >> >> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Bruce Ellis wrote: >> > Indeed. Though I'm waiting for the trivial implementation that does >> > something imaginative with the batshit practice of overwriting lines >> > using CR without LF. > > now that you mention it, vt is missing the flyback transformer whine. you > should be able to *hear* what's displayed. > > - erik >