From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <76b81861d5873750288c3d2bd2f8f30f@jitaku.localdomain> References: <604a6e91e549fb18e8433d37861e7249@brasstown.quanstro.net> <68d6d6d2417b07834ec7ec4a0bfd7c0f@jitaku.localdomain> <003de92482f4b35279bc295768f39fc7@brasstown.quanstro.net> <425d6a70702d0a420b7c4641fef0cb3f@jitaku.localdomain> <27bc6975efd2df448c83b214ec6c0bd7@brasstown.quanstro.net> <76b81861d5873750288c3d2bd2f8f30f@jitaku.localdomain> Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 12:22:46 +1000 Message-ID: From: Bruce Ellis To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bacc0fa9f232304f6a6e4e1 Subject: Re: [9fans] too fast key repeat in pcpae 2cpu mode Topicbox-Message-UUID: d7fbc6f2-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --047d7bacc0fa9f232304f6a6e4e1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Fixed! On 09/04/2014 1:13 PM, wrote: > > so basically the timing loop is messed up. if you could run the amd64 > > kernel on this machine, this will not happen. > > Before I do this, I tried the 'sources' pc kernel for 2 cpu. > It recognizes 2 cpus and has no problem. > > Kenji > > > --047d7bacc0fa9f232304f6a6e4e1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Fixed!

On 09/04/2014 1:13 PM, <kokamoto@hera.eonet.ne.jp> wrote:
> so basically the timing loop is messed up. =C2=A0if you could run the = amd64
> kernel on this machine, this will not happen.

Before I do this, I tried the 'sources' pc kernel for 2 cpu.
It recognizes 2 cpus and has no problem.

Kenji


--047d7bacc0fa9f232304f6a6e4e1--