From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <9b73a2f7842fdf54ca57423261c7ae78@brasstown.quanstro.net> <201109081504.36357.dexen.devries@gmail.com> <20110908194409.743FBB827@mail.bitblocks.com> <20110908203547.C1CF1B827@mail.bitblocks.com> Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 08:49:50 +1000 Message-ID: From: Bruce Ellis To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [9fans] 9ttp Topicbox-Message-UUID: 1c4dc47e-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 Can I just say this is the first time I've been on television? On 9 September 2011 06:43, Francisco J Ballesteros wrote: > And it's likely we'll have it again :) > > For nix, I've just implemented something called IX, while is mostly > multiplexing a single stream to provide concurrent channels and then send > modified 9p requests on them, to be able to put/get entire files like op does. > The server seems to work, and the protocol, according to early testing, > I'm with a caching client doing 9p<>IX, as we speak. > > >>> Deja vu here--I know we just discussed this about a month ago :) >> >> Deja vu all over again. We seem have this discussion every N months. >> > > -- Don't meddle in the mouth -- MVS (0416935147, +1-513-3BRUCEE)