9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Ellis <bruce.ellis@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Sad News
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 10:20:54 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJQxxwkUFi7=ThYi8KDg0OcPwN2rTA8ArkNzLJ=uEuBrXa44aw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19009B53-F1BE-4357-9B77-BBDF9215F80A@verizon.net>

The form was colloquially known as the "I Am Great" report.

brucee

On 14 October 2011 09:57, Thomas <twest9@verizon.net> wrote:
> I remember his giving a talk about 5 years ago at the time of his
>
> retirement from Bell Labs. He was delighted that he was now  a
>
> contract employee and no longer had to fill out a
>
> certain form annually and answer a question something like:
>
> "What have you done for Bell Labs this year?"
>
> Free at last.
>
> -Tom West
>
>
> On Oct 13, 2011, at 5:19 PM, Nick LaForge wrote:
>
>>> It is so sad that the people most responsible for the key software
>>> technologies are almost unheard of by the general public, and most
>>> credit seems to be given to people that jump on the bandwagon much
>>> later..
>>
>>> If there was a Nobel prize for software, dmr would have been one of
>>> the top on my list.
>>
>> The public's traditional fascination with physics makes an interesting
>> comparison, considering the relative obscurity computer science
>> enjoys.
>>
>> Physics' gifts include nuclear fission, medical imaging, aerospace,
>> semiconducting... the list is enumerable. Yet the greatest celebrity
>> among physicists undoubtedly is Albert Einstein, who's contributions
>> are most significant theoretically (aerospace aside).  So it seems
>> fitting that a similarly theoretical and precise discipline like
>> computer science should enjoy comparable status (in opposition to the
>> actual situation where Gates and Jobs get the glory).  Ironically, the
>> real reason for mathematics omission by Nobel likely was that Alfred
>> Nobel thought it TOO theoretical a discipline (see
>> http://mathforum.org/social/articles/ross.html).  Regardless, it took
>> people like dmr (and Turing, Church, Shannon, Neumann, Dijkstra,
>> Backus, Forsythe, Floyd, Hoare, Knuth, ...) to map abstract
>> mathematical science onto workable machines.
>>
>> Maybe such a collaborative science doesn't permit hero worship?  Dmr's
>> own publicly visible accomplishments alone make him worthy of it, yet
>> his humility was so apparent ("I'm not a person who particularly had
>> heros when growing up").  Perhaps his behind-the-scenes impact among
>> his colleagues at Bell Labs eclipse even what everyone else can see.
>>
>> But it's still sad that among those acquainted with Einstein and his
>> contributions, less than 1% seem to even know who Turing was.
>>
>> Nick
>>
>
>
>



-- 
Don't meddle in the mouth -- MVS (0416935147, +1-513-3BRUCEE)



  reply	other threads:[~2011-10-13 23:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-13  5:29 Tharaneedharan Vilwanathan
2011-10-13  5:35 ` Tharaneedharan Vilwanathan
2011-10-13  6:57   ` Peter A. Cejchan
2011-10-13 13:19 ` ComeauAt9Fans@gmail.com
2011-10-13 13:44   ` Digby Tarvin
2011-10-13 13:30 ` dexen deVries
2011-10-13 15:19 ` pera
2011-10-13 16:56   ` Digby Tarvin
2011-10-13 17:26     ` Wes Kussmaul
2011-10-13 17:40       ` simon softnet
2011-10-13 18:24       ` Digby Tarvin
2011-10-13 18:38         ` Charles Forsyth
2011-10-13 17:19   ` tlaronde
2011-10-13 17:22     ` Lluís Batlle i Rossell
2011-10-13 19:30       ` erik quanstrom
2011-10-13 20:02         ` Wes Kussmaul
2011-10-13 21:19         ` Nick LaForge
2011-10-13 22:57           ` Thomas
2011-10-13 23:20             ` Bruce Ellis [this message]
2011-10-24  8:46         ` Akshat Kumar
2011-11-10  9:43           ` Peter A. Cejchan
2011-11-10 12:56             ` Wes Kussmaul
2011-11-10 12:57             ` Wes Kussmaul
2011-11-11  0:10               ` clinton
2011-10-13 18:14   ` ComeauAt9Fans@gmail.com
2020-09-28 18:32 Sad news Dan Cross
2020-09-28 18:54 ` [9fans] " Gorka Guardiola
2020-09-28 19:24   ` Gabriel Díaz López De La Llave
2020-09-28 19:29 ` Federico Benavento
2020-09-28 19:38   ` Don Bailey
2020-09-28 21:31 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2020-09-29  3:44   ` Lucio De Re
2020-09-29  8:01     ` enrique.soriano
2020-09-29  8:07 ` Francisco Ballesteros
2020-09-29 11:57   ` elbingmiss
2020-09-30  8:20     ` Sergey Zhilkin
2020-09-30  8:43 ` Christopher Nielsen
2020-09-29  8:14 Steve Simon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJQxxwkUFi7=ThYi8KDg0OcPwN2rTA8ArkNzLJ=uEuBrXa44aw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=bruce.ellis@gmail.com \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).