From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <72d31b341af6022c42c7660c4a60f97b@ghost.inri> References: <72d31b341af6022c42c7660c4a60f97b@ghost.inri> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 19:50:01 -0700 Message-ID: From: Skip Tavakkolian To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c08b2d0906614053054d537 Subject: Re: [9fans] Go on Plan 9? Topicbox-Message-UUID: 8cf764ee-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --94eb2c08b2d0906614053054d537 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I think Richards' CL's were submitted to main Go repo before Go 1.6 and are now in 1.7 dev branch (tip). I believe I first saw the announcement on godev list. as a Go user, it is a good way of keeping up with the fast-paced development; e.g. IBM's linux/s390x port went in today! I usually keep one environment in sync with the latest sources and try out the new features that affect me the most, but I don't think there's anything special about that. Next to try on Plan 9: build a linux/s390x binary and find a machine to run it on :) On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 2:44 PM, wrote: > Skip, isn't the point here that being able to run go binaries > in Plan 9 on an arm machine is news to most Plan 9 users? > > Perhaps even news to those who regularly use go on Plan 9. > > sl > > --94eb2c08b2d0906614053054d537 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I think Richards' CL's were submitted to main= Go repo before Go 1.6 and are now in 1.7 dev branch (tip). I believe I fir= st saw the announcement on godev list. as a Go user, it is a good way of ke= eping up with the fast-paced development; e.g. IBM's linux/s390x port w= ent in today!

I usually keep one environment in sy= nc with the latest sources and try out the new features that affect me the = most, but I don't think there's anything special about that.
<= div>
Next to try on Plan 9: build a linux/s390x binary and fi= nd a machine to run it on :)



On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 a= t 2:44 PM, <sl@9front.org> wrote:
Skip, isn't the point here that being able to run go binaries in Plan 9 on an arm machine is news to most Plan 9 users?

Perhaps even news to those who regularly use go on Plan 9.

sl


--94eb2c08b2d0906614053054d537--