From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Skip Tavakkolian Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 23:23:16 +0000 Message-ID: To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134a6162d196705129de261 Subject: [9fans] puzzling 9P server / 9pcon interaction Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4c571f38-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --001a1134a6162d196705129de261 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 i'm trying to test a new 9P fs with 9pcon. after posting the file server's fd to /srv, it can be mounted (e.g. mount /srv/foo /n/foo) and walked correctly. trying 9pcon on the same fd (e.g. aux/9pcon /srv/foo) results in "inappropriate use of fd". any ideas? fyi, the 9p code is from scartch based on re-re-reading of 0intro(5) docs, so it is entirely possible i missed something subtle that 9pcon doesn't tolerate. --001a1134a6162d196705129de261 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
i'm trying to test a new 9P fs with 9pcon. after = posting the file server's fd to /srv, it can be mounted (e.g. mount /sr= v/foo /n/foo) and walked correctly. =C2=A0trying 9pcon on the same fd (e.g.= aux/9pcon /srv/foo) results in "inappropriate use of fd".
<= div>
any ideas? =C2=A0fyi, the 9p code is from scartch based = on re-re-reading of 0intro(5) docs, so it is entirely possible i missed som= ething subtle that 9pcon doesn't tolerate.

--001a1134a6162d196705129de261--