From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201201112357.aa29916@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> References: <86vcoif5f4.fsf@cmarib.ramside> <51f1e63c93964ae652bc2d38be222af4@lvoc.net> <201201112357.aa29916@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:33:41 -0800 Message-ID: From: Skip Tavakkolian To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan 9/plan9port coding conventions Topicbox-Message-UUID: 585b7e70-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 by way of an example: int pszBesmirchHungeriansNotation; -Skip On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 3:57 PM, John Stalker wrote: > One thing to remember about descriptive identifiers is that the > compiler doesn't check whether the descriptions are accurate or > not. =A0Often they were when the code was first written, but become > less so over time. =A0Sometimes they were never accurate. =A0One nice > thing about i, j, etc. is that you aren't tempted to make assumptions > about them that aren't backed up by the code. =A0But I'm a mathematician, > so I tend to have peculiar ideas about such things. > > -- > John Stalker > School of Mathematics > Trinity College Dublin > tel +353 1 896 1983 > fax +353 1 896 2282 >