From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <4ECA333A.2010600@gmail.com> <4ECA89D4.9080803@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 10:51:52 -0800 Message-ID: From: Skip Tavakkolian To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [9fans] 9vx instability Topicbox-Message-UUID: 44f0eb7c-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 it seems to me that cat-v.org is in the business of promoting itself. i've had patches that were accepted and some that were rejected for good reasons. please point out the rejected patches (which are also kept) so that we can judge the veracity of the claims being made. I have great respect for Geoff and what he has been and continues to do for Plan 9. -Skip On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Rudolf Sykora wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Anton wrote: >>> Btw, why there are 9atom and 9front? >>> I mean, why they aren't joined together? What the difference between them? > > On 22 November 2011 00:02, Skip Tavakkolian wrote: >> because 9fans not only agree to disagree, they also disagree to agree :) > > This, to be honest, doesn't say much. > However, recently I stumbled over this: > http://www.sptechweb.com/content/article.aspx?ArticleID=35742&print=true > > Ruda > >