From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 09:44:31 -0800 Message-ID: From: Skip Tavakkolian To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0149c5064bb56004eca4d906 Subject: Re: [9fans] Go and 21-bit runes (and a bit of Go status) Topicbox-Message-UUID: 919c148c-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --089e0149c5064bb56004eca4d906 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 i agree; i was also surprised when i realized this. On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Charles Forsyth wrote: > > On 3 December 2013 16:04, wrote: > >> To keep the Go distribution honest? Eventually, we'd want as much >> convergence as possible, forking the library would make it easier to >> diverge without consequences. >> > > but it's not a question of forking the library. there's a ton of stuff > under go/src, > so what makes libbio special? why not just compile the one there for its > use, which is the one it expects? > the output goes into a go-specific target directory; what else will care? > --089e0149c5064bb56004eca4d906 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
i agree; i was also surprised when i realized this.
<= div class=3D"gmail_extra">

On Tue, Dec 3,= 2013 at 8:47 AM, Charles Forsyth <charles.forsyth@gmail.com&g= t; wrote:
=

On 3 December 2013 16:04, = <lucio@proxima.alt.za> wrote:
To keep the Go distribution honest? =A0Event= ually, we'd want as much
convergence as possible, forking the library would make it easier to
diverge without consequences.

but it'= s not a question of forking the library. there's a ton of stuff under g= o/src,
so what makes libbio special? why no= t just compile the one there for its =A0use, which is the one it expects?
the output goes into a go-specific target direct= ory; what else will care?

--089e0149c5064bb56004eca4d906--